CHAITHRA ATHITHI JUSTINE vs RAGESH. K.C Advocate - Rajeshan K — 7/2021

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--Acquitted U/S 279 BNSS on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed

ST - SUMMARY TRIAL

CNR: KLKN120007572021

Filing Number

8/2021

Filing Date

08-Apr-2021

Registration No

7/2021

Registration Date

09-Apr-2021

Court

Additional Munsiffs Court Kannur

Judge

4-Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Acquitted U/S 279 BNSS

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHAITHRA ATHITHI JUSTINE

    Adv. Philip KA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAGESH. K.C Advocate - Rajeshan K

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court acquitted the accused Ragesh K.C. under Section 256 of the Criminal Procedure Code for the offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act due to the complainant's repeated non-appearance and failure to tender evidence despite requests for adjournment. The accused's bail bond was cancelled and he was set at liberty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur

  4. 04-May-2026

    for evidence

    Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur

  5. 16-Apr-2026

    for evidence

    Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    for evidence

    Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur

  7. 21-Feb-2026

    For evidence

    Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur

  8. 17-Jan-2026

    Issue notice

    Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur

  9. 09-Dec-2025

    For evidence

    Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur

  10. 27-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 08-Apr-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 7/2021

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the accused Ragesh K.C. under Section 256 of the Criminal Procedure Code for the offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act due to the complainant's repeated non-appearance and failure to tender evidence despite requests for adjournment. The accused's bail bond was cancelled and he was set at liberty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case