SAJANI P P vs P GEETHA — 350/2024
Case under --- Section SECTION26ORDERVIIRULE1. Status: call on. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKN120005522024
e-Filing Number
29-08-2024
Filing Number
264/2024
Filing Date
03-Sep-2024
Registration No
350/2024
Registration Date
03-Sep-2024
Court
Additional Munsiffs Court Kannur
Judge
4-Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SAJANI P P
Adv. Balaram KK
Respondent(s)
-
1.P GEETHA
Case History
-
18-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-May-2026
call on
Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur
-
21-Mar-2026
For commission report
Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur
-
16-Mar-2026
For Counter in IA
Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur
-
13-Mar-2026
For Counter in IA
Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur
-
20-Feb-2026
For Counter in IA
Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur
-
19-Jan-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: Sajani P P v. P Geetha (OS 350/2024) Outcome: Suit decreed with preliminary decree for property partition. The Munsiff Court of Kannur granted plaintiff Sajani P P's partition suit against defendants (P Geetha, P Anitha, P Vinod). The court found that a 1996 Will (Ext.A2) executed by the late P P Madhavi was genuine and valid, bequeathing 4 cents of property with house to plaintiff's father Dineshan and 4 cents to Revathi. The court rejected defendants' 1983 Will (Ext.B1) as they failed to produce attesting witnesses per succession law requirements. Plaintiff successfully proved testamentary capacity and proper execution through witness testimony and registered documentation. The 8-cent property shall be divided equally: plaintiff receives one 4-cent share with the house; defendants receive the other 4-cent share. Suit costs payable from estate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jan-2026
For Steps
Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur
-
18-Dec-2025
Order/ Judgement
Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur
-
10-Dec-2025
For Hearing
Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur
-
06-Dec-2025
For Hearing
Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur
-
05-Dec-2025
For further Defence evidence
Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur
-
28-Nov-2025
For evidence
Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur
-
25-Nov-2025
For Steps
Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur
-
21-Nov-2025
Defendant/Respondent Evidence
Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur
-
18-Nov-2025
Notice to the witness
Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur
-
17-Nov-2025
Issues
Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur
-
14-Nov-2025
For additional written statement
Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur
-
07-Nov-2025
For Counter in IA
Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur
-
06-Nov-2025
For Counter in IA
Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur
-
22-Sep-2025
Listed to
Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur
-
07-Aug-2025
Await report
Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur
-
19-Jul-2025
For reports
Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur
-
17-Jun-2025
For reports
Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur
-
10-Jun-2025
Appearance of Parties
Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur
-
07-Apr-2025
Appearance of Parties
Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur
-
07-Mar-2025
Issues
Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur
-
05-Feb-2025
Issues
Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur
-
10-Dec-2024
Written Statement
Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur
-
03-Oct-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Sep-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 350/2024
Case Summary: Sajani P P v. P Geetha (OS 350/2024) Outcome: Suit decreed with preliminary decree for property partition. The Munsiff Court of Kannur granted plaintiff Sajani P P's partition suit against defendants (P Geetha, P Anitha, P Vinod). The court found that a 1996 Will (Ext.A2) executed by the late P P Madhavi was genuine and valid, bequeathing 4 cents of property with house to plaintiff's father Dineshan and 4 cents to Revathi. The court rejected defendants' 1983 Will (Ext.B1) as they failed to produce attesting witnesses per succession law requirements. Plaintiff successfully proved testamentary capacity and proper execution through witness testimony and registered documentation. The 8-cent property shall be divided equally: plaintiff receives one 4-cent share with the house; defendants receive the other 4-cent share. Suit costs payable from estate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts