Fathima Razik Kallinkal Kakkantavida @Kallinkal Kakkantavida Fathima vs Pallichal Pramod — 142/2025

Case under Buildings (lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 (kerala) Section 11(2) (a) (b). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 04th April 2026.

RCP - RENT CONTROL PETITION

CNR: KLKN120004062025

Case disposed

Filing Number

982/2025

Filing Date

23-09-2025

Registration No

142/2025

Registration Date

07-10-2025

Court

Additional Munsiffs Court Kannur

Judge

4-Addl. Munsiff/JFCM 5, Kannur

Decision Date

04th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 (Kerala) Section 11(2) (a) (b)

Petitioner(s)

Fathima Razik Kallinkal Kakkantavida @Kallinkal Kakkantavida Fathima

Adv. Muhammed ameen k k

Respondent(s)

Pallichal Pramod

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Addl. Munsiff/JFCM 5, Kannur

04-04-2026

Disposed

30-03-2026

Order/ Judgement

27-03-2026

FOR HEARING

23-03-2026

FOR HEARING

13-03-2026

FOR HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

04-04-2026
Order

Case Summary: Rent Control Petition No. 142/2025 The Rent Control Court, Kannur allowed the eviction petition filed by landlord Fathima Razik against tenant Pallichal Pramod. The court found that the respondent willfully kept rent arrears of 10 months on a property leased for an electronics repair business at Rs. 1,500/month. The petitioner established bonafide need for the building to set up an office for her son's construction business, with no alternative accommodation available. The respondent failed to appear or contest the proceedings, leaving his claims about livelihood dependency and alternative premises unproven. The court ordered the respondent to vacate within one month and pay all arrears plus court costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Rent Control Petition No. 142/2025 The Rent Control Court, Kannur allowed the eviction petition filed by landlord Fathima Razik against tenant Pallichal Pramod. The court found that the respondent willfully kept rent arrears of 10 months on a property leased for an electronics repair business at Rs. 1,500/month. The petitioner established bonafide need for the building to set up an office for her son's construction business, with no alternative accommodation available. The respondent failed to appear or contest the proceedings, leaving his claims about livelihood dependency and alternative premises unproven. The court ordered the respondent to vacate within one month and pay all arrears plus court costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Additional Munsiffs Court Kannur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case