Nuseeba VelluvakandyPuthiyapirayil vs Rasheeda Velluvakandy Puthiyapurayil — 374/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section S 26 O 7 R 1. Status: call on. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKN120003202021
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
Filing Number
9918/2021
Filing Date
23-11-2021
Registration No
374/2021
Registration Date
23-11-2021
Court
Additional Munsiffs Court Kannur
Judge
4-Addl. Munsiff/JFCM 5, Kannur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nuseeba VelluvakandyPuthiyapirayil
Respondent(s)
Rasheeda Velluvakandy Puthiyapurayil
Moidu V.K
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Addl. Munsiff/JFCM 5, Kannur
call on
Steps if any
Steps if any
For hearing on IA
For hearing on IA
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-05-2026 | call on |
| 06-04-2026 | Steps if any |
| 21-03-2026 | Steps if any |
| 16-03-2026 | For hearing on IA |
| 12-03-2026 | For hearing on IA |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Munsiff's court dismissed the defendants' petition seeking to set aside the advocate commissioner's report and survey plan dated 26.09.2023 in a property dispute case. The court found no valid grounds to set aside the report, noting that the commissioner was assisted by a retired Assistant Survey Director and that both parties and their counsel were present during the inspection; the court held that flimsy allegations without examination of the commissioner or surveyor do not warrant setting aside the report at this interlocutory stage, though such issues may be reconsidered after evidence production at final hearing. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Munsiff's court dismissed the defendants' petition seeking to set aside the advocate commissioner's report and survey plan dated 26.09.2023 in a property dispute case. The court found no valid grounds to set aside the report, noting that the commissioner was assisted by a retired Assistant Survey Director and that both parties and their counsel were present during the inspection; the court held that flimsy allegations without examination of the commissioner or surveyor do not warrant setting aside the report at this interlocutory stage, though such issues may be reconsidered after evidence production at final hearing. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts