MowancheryCo.Operative Rural Bank Ltd. Represented by its secretary RameshBabu.C.P, vs Ahammed Tharal Advocate - Santhoshkumar M — 365/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order 21 rule 37 and 38. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 02nd June 2026.
EP - EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: KLKN110009532025
Filing Number
1242/2025
Filing Date
19-09-2025
Registration No
365/2025
Registration Date
29-09-2025
Court
Principal Munsiffs Court, Kannur
Judge
3-Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
Decision Date
02nd June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MowancheryCo.Operative Rural Bank Ltd. Represented by its secretary RameshBabu.C.P,
Adv. Roopesh K
Respondent(s)
Ahammed Tharal Advocate - Santhoshkumar M
Pocker Kunnumbrath
RafeekPuthanPurayil
Adv. Deepak C,LISHA N
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
Disposed
Order/Judgement
call on
for evidence
for evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 22-05-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 04-04-2026 | call on |
| 27-03-2026 | for evidence |
| 23-03-2026 | for evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: EP 365/2025 The Munsiff's court dismissed Mowanchery Co-operative Rural Bank's execution petition seeking recovery of Rs. 94,720 from three judgment debtors for default. The court found that the bank failed to prove the debtors had means to pay despite being directed to do so through multiple hearings between March and May 2026; the bank provided no evidence or application under CPC Order XXI, Rule 41(2) despite multiple opportunities. The dismissal does not bar the bank from filing a fresh execution petition using the same or different recovery modes within the limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: EP 365/2025 The Munsiff's court dismissed Mowanchery Co-operative Rural Bank's execution petition seeking recovery of Rs. 94,720 from three judgment debtors for default. The court found that the bank failed to prove the debtors had means to pay despite being directed to do so through multiple hearings between March and May 2026; the bank provided no evidence or application under CPC Order XXI, Rule 41(2) despite multiple opportunities. The dismissal does not bar the bank from filing a fresh execution petition using the same or different recovery modes within the limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts