Nabeesa Thayilakandy Puthiyapurayil vs Subaida T — 341/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDERVIIRULEI. Status: Stay report. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.

Stay report Next hearing 30-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLKN110009352024

e-Filing Number

29-08-2024

Filing Number

1122/2024

Filing Date

29-Aug-2024

Registration No

341/2024

Registration Date

29-Aug-2024

Court

Principal Munsiffs Court, Kannur

Judge

3-Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDERVIIRULEI

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nabeesa Thayilakandy Puthiyapurayil

    Adv. R Mahesh Varma

  2. 2.Jabbar Thayilakandy Puthiyapurayil

    Adv. R Mahesh Varma

  3. 3.Shabana P

    Adv. R Mahesh Varma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Subaida T

Case History

  1. 30-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-May-2026

    Stay report

    Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    For hearing on IA

    Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

  4. 04-Feb-2026

    Await report

    Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

  5. 19-Dec-2025

    Await report

    Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

  6. 14-Nov-2025

    Await report

    Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

  7. 09-Oct-2025

    Call With IA

    Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

  8. 22-Sep-2025

    For additional written statement

    Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

  9. 16-Aug-2025

    For Steps

    Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

  10. 15-Jul-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

  11. 02-Jul-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

  12. 31-May-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: OS 341/2024 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED with mandatory injunction granted. The Munsiff's court ordered the respondents (Subaida T and Shabeena T) to restore a disputed pathway (Schedule B property) to its original condition by removing a newly constructed compound wall and gate within one month at their own cost. The court found that the petitioners established a prima facie case of easement by prescription over an 8-foot-wide pathway used for over 80 years to access their properties, and that the respondents violated an earlier ad-interim injunction order by blocking it. The court rejected the respondents' claim that they constructed the wall with court permission, finding the gate was placed at a point that obstructed the pathway's use. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 31-May-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

  14. 30-May-2025

    Orders in IA

    Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

  15. 24-May-2025

    Orders in IA

    Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

  16. 10-Apr-2025

    Orders in IA

    Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

  17. 09-Apr-2025

    Call With IA

    Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

  18. 07-Apr-2025

    Call With IA

    Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

  19. 01-Apr-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

  20. 22-Mar-2025

    Call With IA

    Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

  21. 21-Mar-2025

    Call With IA

    Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

  22. 10-Mar-2025

    Call With IA

    Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

  23. 07-Mar-2025

    Call With IA

    Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

  24. 06-Mar-2025

    call on

    Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

  25. 05-Mar-2025

    Await report

    Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

  26. 01-Mar-2025

    Appearance of Parties

    Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

  27. 25-Feb-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

  28. 13-Feb-2025

    Call With IA

    Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

  29. 07-Feb-2025

    For commission report

    Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

  30. 07-Jan-2025

    Appearance of Parties

    Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

  31. 21-Dec-2024

    call on

    Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

  32. 27-Nov-2024

    Call With IA

    Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

  33. 23-Nov-2024

    Call With IA

    Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

  34. 29-Oct-2024

    Written Statement

    Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

  35. 28-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 29-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 341/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS 341/2024 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED with mandatory injunction granted. The Munsiff's court ordered the respondents (Subaida T and Shabeena T) to restore a disputed pathway (Schedule B property) to its original condition by removing a newly constructed compound wall and gate within one month at their own cost. The court found that the petitioners established a prima facie case of easement by prescription over an 8-foot-wide pathway used for over 80 years to access their properties, and that the respondents violated an earlier ad-interim injunction order by blocking it. The court rejected the respondents' claim that they constructed the wall with court permission, finding the gate was placed at a point that obstructed the pathway's use. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case