Thekkath Pradeeshan vs Parakkandi Prasanna Advocate - THANSEER PP — 235/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21R32. Status: For hearing on EA. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
EP - EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: KLKN110008772022
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
Filing Number
1148/2022
Filing Date
21-11-2022
Registration No
235/2022
Registration Date
21-11-2022
Court
Principal Munsiffs Court, Kannur
Judge
3-Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Thekkath Pradeeshan
Adv. C Krishnan
Respondent(s)
Parakkandi Prasanna Advocate - THANSEER PP (Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
For hearing on EA
For Orders in EA
call on
For Orders in EA
For Orders in EA
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | For hearing on EA |
| 06-04-2026 | For Orders in EA |
| 31-03-2026 | call on |
| 28-03-2026 | For Orders in EA |
| 25-03-2026 | For Orders in EA |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Thekkath Pradeeshan v. Parakkandi Prasanna (EA.05/2026) Outcome: The petition was dismissed on April 8, 2026. Key Points: Petitioner (decree holder in execution proceedings) sought production of original documents from multiple courts to support an execution petition for contempt of an injunction decree. The court found no specific averments demonstrating how original documents were material to the dispute and noted the respondent had eventually filed answers to interrogatories. The court held that certified copies of the requested documents would be sufficient and dismissed the application, directing the decree holder to pursue that alternative remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Thekkath Pradeeshan v. Parakkandi Prasanna (EA.05/2026) Outcome: The petition was dismissed on April 8, 2026. Key Points: Petitioner (decree holder in execution proceedings) sought production of original documents from multiple courts to support an execution petition for contempt of an injunction decree. The court found no specific averments demonstrating how original documents were material to the dispute and noted the respondent had eventually filed answers to interrogatories. The court held that certified copies of the requested documents would be sufficient and dismissed the application, directing the decree holder to pursue that alternative remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts