SECRETARY KANNUR DISTRICT BUS TRANSPORT EMPLOYEES vs SREEJITH PP Advocate - SUNITH KAVILEVEETTIL, SUNITH KAVILEVEETTIL — 293/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER21RULE11,37,38AND51ABC. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 27th March 2026.

EP - EXECUTION PETITION

CNR: KLKN110007912025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

28-07-2025

Filing Number

1153/2025

Filing Date

31-07-2025

Registration No

293/2025

Registration Date

08-08-2025

Court

Principal Munsiffs Court, Kannur

Judge

3-Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

Decision Date

27th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section ORDER21RULE11,37,38AND51ABC

Petitioner(s)

SECRETARY KANNUR DISTRICT BUS TRANSPORT EMPLOYEES

Adv. SAJITH KUMAR A V

Respondent(s)

SREEJITH PP (Public Prosecutor) Advocate - SUNITH KAVILEVEETTIL, SUNITH KAVILEVEETTIL

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

27-03-2026

Disposed

25-03-2026

Order/Judgement

23-03-2026

for evidence

12-03-2026

call on

02-02-2026

for evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

27-03-2026
Order

Summary The Munsiff Court of Kannur dismissed an execution petition filed by Kannur District Bus Transport Employees Sahakarana Sangam for Rs. 17,625 against respondent Sreejith P.P. for default, as the decree holder failed to prove the judgment debtor's means of payment despite four adjournments and court directives. The court noted the decree holder's repeated non-appearance and lack of evidence, combined with a similar petition dismissed in 2022, demonstrated lack of interest in pursuing the execution, though dismissal does not bar filing a fresh petition within the limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Munsiff Court of Kannur dismissed an execution petition filed by Kannur District Bus Transport Employees Sahakarana Sangam for Rs. 17,625 against respondent Sreejith P.P. for default, as the decree holder failed to prove the judgment debtor's means of payment despite four adjournments and court directives. The court noted the decree holder's repeated non-appearance and lack of evidence, combined with a similar petition dismissed in 2022, demonstrated lack of interest in pursuing the execution, though dismissal does not bar filing a fresh petition within the limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal Munsiffs Court, Kannur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case