SECRETARY KANNUR DISTRICT BUS TRANSPORT EMPLOYEES vs SREEJITH PP Advocate - SUNITH KAVILEVEETTIL, SUNITH KAVILEVEETTIL — 293/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER21RULE11,37,38AND51ABC. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 27th March 2026.
EP - EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: KLKN110007912025
e-Filing Number
28-07-2025
Filing Number
1153/2025
Filing Date
31-07-2025
Registration No
293/2025
Registration Date
08-08-2025
Court
Principal Munsiffs Court, Kannur
Judge
3-Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SECRETARY KANNUR DISTRICT BUS TRANSPORT EMPLOYEES
Adv. SAJITH KUMAR A V
Respondent(s)
SREEJITH PP (Public Prosecutor) Advocate - SUNITH KAVILEVEETTIL, SUNITH KAVILEVEETTIL
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
Disposed
Order/Judgement
for evidence
call on
for evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 23-03-2026 | for evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | call on |
| 02-02-2026 | for evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Munsiff Court of Kannur dismissed an execution petition filed by Kannur District Bus Transport Employees Sahakarana Sangam for Rs. 17,625 against respondent Sreejith P.P. for default, as the decree holder failed to prove the judgment debtor's means of payment despite four adjournments and court directives. The court noted the decree holder's repeated non-appearance and lack of evidence, combined with a similar petition dismissed in 2022, demonstrated lack of interest in pursuing the execution, though dismissal does not bar filing a fresh petition within the limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Munsiff Court of Kannur dismissed an execution petition filed by Kannur District Bus Transport Employees Sahakarana Sangam for Rs. 17,625 against respondent Sreejith P.P. for default, as the decree holder failed to prove the judgment debtor's means of payment despite four adjournments and court directives. The court noted the decree holder's repeated non-appearance and lack of evidence, combined with a similar petition dismissed in 2022, demonstrated lack of interest in pursuing the execution, though dismissal does not bar filing a fresh petition within the limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts