Vivek Vadakkan Valappil vs C.P. Sahir — 193/2018
Case under Buildings (lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 (kerala) Section 11(3). Status: For Counter in IA. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
RCP - RENT CONTROL PETITION
CNR: KLKN110007662018
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
Filing Number
9288/2018
Filing Date
25-09-2018
Registration No
193/2018
Registration Date
25-09-2018
Court
Principal Munsiffs Court, Kannur
Judge
3-Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vivek Vadakkan Valappil
Adv. Phalgunan T M
Nambyar Jayaraj
Adv. Phalgunan T M
Tom Mathew
Adv. Phalgunan T M
Swaroop Satheesh
Adv. Phalgunan T M
Sanoop Satheesh
Adv. Phalgunan T M
Favad Abdul Hameed
Adv. Phalgunan T M
Respondent(s)
C.P. Sahir
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
For Counter in IA
Steps if any
Steps if any
Steps if any
Steps if any
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-05-2026 | For Counter in IA |
| 07-04-2026 | Steps if any |
| 30-03-2026 | Steps if any |
| 27-03-2026 | Steps if any |
| 18-03-2026 | Steps if any |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCP 193/2018 The Rent Control Court, Kannur allowed the petition and ordered eviction. The court found that petitioners Vivek Vadakkan Valappil, Nambyar Jayaraj, and Tom Mathew established absolute ownership of the building through registered documents and proved bonafide need to use it for a wholesale paint and hardware business. Respondent C.P. Sahir was directed to vacate within two months, with petitioners entitled to court-enforced execution if needed. The court rejected the respondent's denial of the landlord-tenant relationship as non-bonafide. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCP 193/2018 The Rent Control Court, Kannur allowed the petition and ordered eviction. The court found that petitioners Vivek Vadakkan Valappil, Nambyar Jayaraj, and Tom Mathew established absolute ownership of the building through registered documents and proved bonafide need to use it for a wholesale paint and hardware business. Respondent C.P. Sahir was directed to vacate within two months, with petitioners entitled to court-enforced execution if needed. The court rejected the respondent's denial of the landlord-tenant relationship as non-bonafide. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts