Muhammed Shakir T vs Mashhood K and others Advocate - Sanoop E — 215/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O 7 R 1. Status: Order/ Judgement. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLKN110004192023

Order/ Judgement

Next Hearing

24th June 2026

Filing Number

458/2023

Filing Date

01-06-2023

Registration No

215/2023

Registration Date

01-06-2023

Court

Principal Munsiffs Court, Kannur

Judge

3-Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code Section O 7 R 1
IA/5/2024 Classification : Petition Section Mashhood K and othersShuhaibath T
IA/6/2025 Classification : Application To Receive Documents Section Muhammed Shakir TMashhood K and others
IA/1/2026 Classification : Urgent Application Section Muhammed Shakir TMashhood K and others
IA/2/2026 Classification : Adjournment Application Section Muhammed Shakir TMashhood K and others
IA/3/2026 Classification : Application To Reopen Evidence Section Mashhood K and others
IA/4/2026 Classification : Urgent Application Section Mashhood K and others
IA/5/2026 Classification : Application To Receive Documents Section Mashhood K and others

Petitioner(s)

Muhammed Shakir T

Adv. Naushad K

Respondent(s)

Mashhood K and others Advocate - Sanoop E

Sajid Thayakath

Shuhaibath T

Adv. MANUEL P J

Shahina T

Adv. Sanoop E

Shanib Thayakath

Adv. Sanoop E

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur

03-06-2026

Order/ Judgement

25-05-2026

FOR HEARING

22-05-2026

For Defendent Evidence

21-05-2026

Orders in IA

20-05-2026

For hearing on IA

Interim Orders

22-05-2026
Order

Case Summary: OS.215/2023 Outcome: Application dismissed with no order as to costs. In this property partition suit, Defendant No.3 (Shuhaibath T.) filed an application to recall the plaintiff's testimony (PW1) for additional cross-examination, claiming her previous counsel had inadequately examined the witness due to poor communication. The court rejected this request, holding that a party's change of counsel is not valid grounds to reopen evidence. The court noted the application was filed two months after the original examination and would only delay proceedings, potentially prejudicing the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS.215/2023 Outcome: Application dismissed with no order as to costs. In this property partition suit, Defendant No.3 (Shuhaibath T.) filed an application to recall the plaintiff's testimony (PW1) for additional cross-examination, claiming her previous counsel had inadequately examined the witness due to poor communication. The court rejected this request, holding that a party's change of counsel is not valid grounds to reopen evidence. The court noted the application was filed two months after the original examination and would only delay proceedings, potentially prejudicing the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal Munsiffs Court, Kannur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case