E P Mariyumma and others vs E P Andu and others — 147/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: return of notice. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKN110003852024
Next Hearing
02nd July 2026
e-Filing Number
27-03-2024
Filing Number
491/2024
Filing Date
03-04-2024
Registration No
147/2024
Registration Date
03-04-2024
Court
Principal Munsiffs Court, Kannur
Judge
3-Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
E P Mariyumma and others
Adv. MUHAMMED BASHEER K P
E P Kunjayissa
Adv. MUHAMMED BASHEER K P
E P Sahida
Adv. MUHAMMED BASHEER K P
E P Ramseena
Adv. MUHAMMED BASHEER K P
E P Thanseer
Adv. MUHAMMED BASHEER K P
E P Sabira
Adv. MUHAMMED BASHEER K P
Respondent(s)
E P Andu and others
Suhara
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
return of notice
call on
For Steps
Order/ Judgement
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-06-2026 | return of notice |
| 18-05-2026 | call on |
| 30-03-2026 | For Steps |
| 25-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 23-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS 147/2024 The Munsiff Court of Kannur passed a preliminary decree for partition of a 56-cent property in Kuttiattoor on March 30, 2026. The suit involved multiple family members claiming inheritance rights following deaths of Mavukkandy Moideen and his son Muhammed Kutty. The court divided the property into 448 shares among seven plaintiffs and five defendants, rejecting contentions that certain plaintiffs lacked inheritance rights. Notably, one original defendant was excluded after executing gift deeds alienating her share. Equity claims were deferred to the final decree stage, with each party bearing costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS 147/2024 The Munsiff Court of Kannur passed a preliminary decree for partition of a 56-cent property in Kuttiattoor on March 30, 2026. The suit involved multiple family members claiming inheritance rights following deaths of Mavukkandy Moideen and his son Muhammed Kutty. The court divided the property into 448 shares among seven plaintiffs and five defendants, rejecting contentions that certain plaintiffs lacked inheritance rights. Notably, one original defendant was excluded after executing gift deeds alienating her share. Equity claims were deferred to the final decree stage, with each party bearing costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts