Kannur Jilla Merchantile Co op Society vs MukundanV Advocate - Sajina C — 112/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21R37AND38. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 17th March 2026.
EP - EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: KLKN110003632025
e-Filing Number
24-03-2025
Filing Number
710/2025
Filing Date
29-Mar-2025
Registration No
112/2025
Registration Date
29-Mar-2025
Court
Principal Munsiffs Court, Kannur
Judge
3-Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kannur Jilla Merchantile Co op Society
Adv. R Mahesh Varma
Respondent(s)
-
1.MukundanV Advocate - Sajina C
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Munsiff Court of Kannur dismissed Execution Petition 112/2025 filed by Kannur District Merchants Co-Op Society Ltd. against Mukundan V and others on March 17, 2026. The petition was dismissed for default because the petitioner failed to adduce any evidence and did not comply with court directions, despite both parties being represented by counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
16-Mar-2026
for evidence
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
10-Feb-2026
call on
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
03-Jan-2026
for evidence
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
04-Dec-2025
For affidavit.
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
10-Nov-2025
For affidavit.
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
17-Sep-2025
for evidence
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
06-Aug-2025
for evidence
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
16-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 112/2025
The Munsiff Court of Kannur dismissed Execution Petition 112/2025 filed by Kannur District Merchants Co-Op Society Ltd. against Mukundan V and others on March 17, 2026. The petition was dismissed for default because the petitioner failed to adduce any evidence and did not comply with court directions, despite both parties being represented by counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts