Sreeja Kunhipurayil vs Ashokan Puthiya Purayil — 91/2020
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section U/s26, O 7, R 1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th April 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKN110002162020
Filing Number
2817/2020
Filing Date
16-Mar-2020
Registration No
91/2020
Registration Date
16-Mar-2020
Court
Principal Munsiffs Court, Kannur
Judge
3-Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
Decision Date
08-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sreeja Kunhipurayil
Adv. Rathnakaran CK
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ashokan Puthiya Purayil
-
2.Mohanan K.P
Adv. SUSMITHA K C,KESAVAN A V
-
3.Sarala.P.P
Adv. SUSMITHA K C,KESAVAN A V
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Apr-2026
JudgementView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Munsiff Court of Kannur dismissed the plaintiff's suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a clearly identifiable southern boundary of her property, as the alleged 3-foot pathway and mud wall cited as boundaries either did not exist or were created after property leveling by the plaintiff herself. Without well-defined physical boundaries separating the properties, the court held that no injunction could be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Disposed
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
06-Apr-2026
Order/ Judgement
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
31-Mar-2026
Order/Judgement
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
30-Mar-2026
Order/ Judgement
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
26-Mar-2026
Order/ Judgement
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
25-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
23-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
21-Mar-2026
For Counter in IA
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
18-Mar-2026
Defence Evidence
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
17-Mar-2026
For Counter in IA
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
16-Mar-2026
for evidence
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
12-Mar-2026
for evidence
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
05-Mar-2026
call on
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
13-Jan-2026
Listed to
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
20-Dec-2025
For Steps
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
15-Dec-2025
Pre trial steps
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
21-Nov-2025
Issues
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
31-Oct-2025
Written Statement
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
15-Oct-2025
Issue notice
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
15-Sep-2025
Issue notice
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
22-Aug-2025
Call With IA
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
19-Aug-2025
For Counter in IA
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
16-Jul-2025
For Steps
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
16-Jun-2025
For Steps
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
24-May-2025
Objection to Cr
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
28-Mar-2025
Objection to Cr
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
11-Mar-2025
For commission report
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
13-Feb-2025
For commission report
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
15-Jan-2025
For commission report
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
12-Dec-2024
For commission report
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
11-Nov-2024
For commission report
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
26-Oct-2024
For commission report
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
24-Sep-2024
For commission report
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
08-Aug-2024
For commission report
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
12-Jul-2024
For commission report
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
19-Jun-2024
For commission report
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
30-May-2024
call on
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
20-May-2024
For commission report
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
12-Mar-2024
For commission report
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
06-Feb-2024
For commission report
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
22-Jan-2024
call on
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
08-Dec-2023
Call With IA
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
17-Nov-2023
Call With IA
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
13-Oct-2023
Call With IA
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
22-Aug-2023
Call With IA
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
05-Aug-2023
Steps if any
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
12-Jul-2023
Steps if any
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
19-Jun-2023
Objection to Cr
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
20-May-2023
call on
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
05-Apr-2023
call on
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
18-Mar-2023
call on
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
10-Mar-2023
call on
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
10-Feb-2023
Await report
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
23-Jan-2023
Referred to Mediator
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
10-Jan-2023
Referred to Mediator
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
15-Dec-2022
call on
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
15-Nov-2022
call on
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
29-Sep-2022
call on
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
22-Aug-2022
call on
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
17-Aug-2022
call on
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
12-Aug-2022
call on
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
20-Jun-2022
Listed to
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
09-Jun-2022
Pre trial steps
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
30-May-2022
Pre trial steps
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
06-Apr-2022
Issues
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
11-Feb-2022
Issues
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
14-Dec-2021
Issues
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
20-Oct-2021
Issues
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
02-Sep-2021
Issues
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
21-Jul-2021
Issues
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
15-Jun-2021
Issues
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
24-Mar-2021
Issues
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
27-Jan-2021
Injunction granted and noticed
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
21-Nov-2020
Injunction granted and noticed
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
17-Sep-2020
Injunction granted and noticed
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
23-Jun-2020
Injunction granted and noticed
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
02-Apr-2020
Injunction granted and noticed
Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
-
16-Mar-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Mar-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 91/2020
Court Decision Summary The Munsiff Court of Kannur dismissed the plaintiff's suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a clearly identifiable southern boundary of her property, as the alleged 3-foot pathway and mud wall cited as boundaries either did not exist or were created after property leveling by the plaintiff herself. Without well-defined physical boundaries separating the properties, the court held that no injunction could be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts