Sreeja Kunhipurayil vs Ashokan Puthiya Purayil — 91/2020
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section U/s26, O 7, R 1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th April 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKN110002162020
Filing Number
2817/2020
Filing Date
16-03-2020
Registration No
91/2020
Registration Date
16-03-2020
Court
Principal Munsiffs Court, Kannur
Judge
3-Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sreeja Kunhipurayil
Adv. Rathnakaran CK
Respondent(s)
Ashokan Puthiya Purayil
Mohanan K.P
Adv. SUSMITHA K C,KESAVAN A V
Sarala.P.P
Adv. SUSMITHA K C,KESAVAN A V
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Prl. Munsiff/jfcm4, Kannur
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Order/Judgement
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-04-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 31-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 30-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 26-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Munsiff Court of Kannur dismissed the plaintiff's suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a clearly identifiable southern boundary of her property, as the alleged 3-foot pathway and mud wall cited as boundaries either did not exist or were created after property leveling by the plaintiff herself. Without well-defined physical boundaries separating the properties, the court held that no injunction could be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Munsiff Court of Kannur dismissed the plaintiff's suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a clearly identifiable southern boundary of her property, as the alleged 3-foot pathway and mud wall cited as boundaries either did not exist or were created after property leveling by the plaintiff herself. Without well-defined physical boundaries separating the properties, the court held that no injunction could be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts