Muhammed Gous @ Thajudheen vs Safreena Advocate - BINDU KOOVA — 423/2025
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section UNDER SEC. 29. Status: Issue notice. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
Crl.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: KLKN010052372025
Filing Number
2391/2025
Filing Date
30-Dec-2025
Registration No
423/2025
Registration Date
31-Dec-2025
Court
District Court and Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thalassery
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Muhammed Gous @ Thajudheen
Adv. VISWAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.Safreena Advocate - BINDU KOOVA
-
2.Muhammed Shahabas
Adv. BINDU KOOVA
-
3.Maisa Mehara
Adv. BINDU KOOVA
-
4.State, rep.by Public Prosecutor, Thalassery
Case History
-
19-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case 423/2025 Summary: The Sessions Court, Thalassery partially allowed the petition filed by Muhammed Gous seeking to stay proceedings from the Magistrate Court's order dated 06.10.2025. Stay of proceedings was granted except for maintenance relief (Relief No. 3), which continues until disposal of the appeal. The court thus allowed the petitioner's stay request in part while preserving the respondent's right to maintenance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Issue notice
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
For Payment
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
No sitting notified
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
Call with Mp
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Jan-2026
call on
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 423/2025
Case 423/2025 Summary: The Sessions Court, Thalassery partially allowed the petition filed by Muhammed Gous seeking to stay proceedings from the Magistrate Court's order dated 06.10.2025. Stay of proceedings was granted except for maintenance relief (Relief No. 3), which continues until disposal of the appeal. The court thus allowed the petitioner's stay request in part while preserving the respondent's right to maintenance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts