Sriram finance vs Madhusoodhanan.K, — 606/2025

Case under Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996\ Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--Closed on 12th March 2026.

OP(Arb) - ORIGINAL PETITION (ARBITRATION)

CNR: KLKN010048602025

Case disposed

Filing Number

26347/2025

Filing Date

16-11-2025

Registration No

606/2025

Registration Date

08-12-2025

Court

District Court and Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thalassery

Judge

3-2nd Additional District Judge

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Closed

Acts & Sections

Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996\ Section 9
IA/1/2025 Classification : Petition Section Sriram finance
IA/2/2025 Classification : Application To Accept Power Of Attorney Section Sriram finance
IA/3/2025 Classification : Petition Section Sriram finance
IA/4/2025 Classification : Petition For Police Assistance Section Sriram finance

Petitioner(s)

Sriram finance

Adv. N K Pratap

Respondent(s)

Madhusoodhanan.K,

V.C.Rajamani,

Suresh Babu.V.C,

Hearing History

Judge: 3-2nd Additional District Judge

12-03-2026

Disposed

26-02-2026

For commission report

21-02-2026

For reports

29-01-2026

For commission report

10-12-2025

For commission report

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Order

The Additional District Judge-II at Thalassery closed an arbitration petition filed by Shriram Finance Limited against respondents regarding a vehicle recovery matter. The court found that since the subject vehicle could not be traced despite efforts by the Advocate Commissioner, there was no purpose in continuing the petition and accordingly dismissed it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional District Judge-II at Thalassery closed an arbitration petition filed by Shriram Finance Limited against respondents regarding a vehicle recovery matter. The court found that since the subject vehicle could not be traced despite efforts by the Advocate Commissioner, there was no purpose in continuing the petition and accordingly dismissed it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Court and Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thalassery All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case