Asokan K vs The District Collector, Kannur — 416/2022

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 76. Disposed: Contested--AWARD PASSED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

LAR - LAND ACQUISITION REFERENCE

CNR: KLKN010047722022

Filing Number

4162022/2022

Filing Date

16-Dec-2022

Registration No

416/2022

Registration Date

16-Dec-2022

Court

District Court and Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thalassery

Judge

3-2nd Additional District Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--AWARD PASSED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 76
Ia/1/2025 Classification : Application to Receive Documents
Ia/2/2025 Classification : Application for Admission of Documents Section Asokan KThe District Collector, Kannur
Ia/1/2026 Classification : Application for Admission of Documents Section Asokan KThe District Collector, Kannur

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Asokan K

    Adv. Unknown

  2. 2.Ajith Kumar K

  3. 3.Majisha K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The District Collector, Kannur

  2. 2.The Executive Engineer

  3. 3.Special Tahsildar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    AwardView PDF

    Case Summary: LARR No. 416/2022 The Land Acquisition Authority, Thalassery held that claimants Ashokan K, Ajith Kumar K, and Majisha K have absolute title and possession over 0.0011 hectares of acquired land in Pinarayi Village, establishing their inheritance through documented succession from Janaki (their deceased mother). The court awarded compensation of ₹65,209 to be distributed among the three claimants, with interest from fixed deposit, finding their documentary evidence (release deed, death certificate, family membership certificate, and historical will) sufficient to prove title despite lack of purchase certificate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Additional District Judge

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    2nd Additional District Judge

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    2nd Additional District Judge

  6. 15-Dec-2025

    For production of documents/Affidavit

    2nd Additional District Judge

  7. 24-Nov-2025

    For evidence.

    2nd Additional District Judge

  8. 19-Nov-2025

    Order/ Judgement

    2nd Additional District Judge

  9. 05-Nov-2025

    Order/ Judgement

    2nd Additional District Judge

  10. 03-Nov-2025

    For evidence.

    2nd Additional District Judge

  11. 15-Sep-2025

    For Further Defence Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge

  12. 11-Aug-2025

    For evidence.

    2nd Additional District Judge

  13. 09-Jun-2025

    For production of documents/Affidavit

    2nd Additional District Judge

  14. 05-Apr-2025

    For evidence.

    2nd Additional District Judge

  15. 01-Feb-2025

    For evidence.

    2nd Additional District Judge

  16. 30-Nov-2024

    For evidence.

    2nd Additional District Judge

  17. 13-Sep-2024

    For counter

    2nd Additional District Judge

  18. 04-Jul-2024

    For counter

    2nd Additional District Judge

  19. 15-Mar-2024

    Adjourned

    2nd Additional District Judge

  20. 06-Dec-2023

    For claim statement

    2nd Additional District Judge

  21. 18-Sep-2023

    For claim statement

    2nd Additional District Judge

  22. 15-Mar-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 16-Dec-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 416/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: LARR No. 416/2022 The Land Acquisition Authority, Thalassery held that claimants Ashokan K, Ajith Kumar K, and Majisha K have absolute title and possession over 0.0011 hectares of acquired land in Pinarayi Village, establishing their inheritance through documented succession from Janaki (their deceased mother). The court awarded compensation of ₹65,209 to be distributed among the three claimants, with interest from fixed deposit, finding their documentary evidence (release deed, death certificate, family membership certificate, and historical will) sufficient to prove title despite lack of purchase certificate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case