The SHO Thalassery Polie station vs Sijo savier — 782/2024
Case under Ipc \ Section 324,394,307,326. Status: remand Extended. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLKN010042792024
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
1002918/2024
Filing Date
25-11-2024
Registration No
782/2024
Registration Date
25-11-2024
Court
District Court and Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thalassery
Judge
5-4th Additional District Judge
FIR Details
FIR Number
525
Police Station
Thalassery Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The SHO (Station House Officer) Thalassery Polie station
Adv. APP Thalassery
Respondent(s)
Sijo savier
Hearing History
Judge: 5-4th Additional District Judge
remand Extended
remand Extended
remand Extended
remand Extended
remand Extended
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-06-2026 | remand Extended |
| 19-05-2026 | remand Extended |
| 06-05-2026 | remand Extended |
| 23-04-2026 | remand Extended |
| 10-04-2026 | remand Extended |
Interim Orders
Case 782/2024 Summary Accused Sijo Savier filed criminal miscellaneous petitions from jail seeking a lenient sentence commensurate with his pre-trial detention of over one year, expressing willingness to plead guilty. The court rejected his plea bargaining request, holding that while plea bargaining is permissible, the grave and serious allegations (carrying up to 10 years imprisonment) and the accused's criminal antecedents preclude acceptance of a sentence limited to time already served. The petitions were disposed of with the court stating it would impose an appropriate sentence if the accused pleads guilty, determined by the case's gravity and circumstances rather than negotiation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 782/2024 Summary Accused Sijo Savier filed criminal miscellaneous petitions from jail seeking a lenient sentence commensurate with his pre-trial detention of over one year, expressing willingness to plead guilty. The court rejected his plea bargaining request, holding that while plea bargaining is permissible, the grave and serious allegations (carrying up to 10 years imprisonment) and the accused's criminal antecedents preclude acceptance of a sentence limited to time already served. The petitions were disposed of with the court stating it would impose an appropriate sentence if the accused pleads guilty, determined by the case's gravity and circumstances rather than negotiation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts