The SHO Thalassery Polie station vs Sijo savier — 782/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,394,307,326. Status: remand Extended. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

remand Extended Next hearing 12-Jun-2026 this date has passed

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: KLKN010042792024

Filing Number

1002918/2024

Filing Date

25-Nov-2024

Registration No

782/2024

Registration Date

25-Nov-2024

Court

District Court and Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thalassery

Judge

5-4th Additional District Judge

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

525

Police Station

Thalassery Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 324,394,307,326

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The SHO (Station House Officer) Thalassery Polie station

    Adv. APP Thalassery

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sijo savier

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    remand Extended

    4th Additional District Judge

  3. 19-May-2026

    remand Extended

    4th Additional District Judge

  4. 06-May-2026

    remand Extended

    4th Additional District Judge

  5. 23-Apr-2026

    remand Extended

    4th Additional District Judge

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    remand Extended

    4th Additional District Judge

  7. 26-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  8. 26-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  9. 26-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case 782/2024 Summary Accused Sijo Savier filed criminal miscellaneous petitions from jail seeking a lenient sentence commensurate with his pre-trial detention of over one year, expressing willingness to plead guilty. The court rejected his plea bargaining request, holding that while plea bargaining is permissible, the grave and serious allegations (carrying up to 10 years imprisonment) and the accused's criminal antecedents preclude acceptance of a sentence limited to time already served. The petitions were disposed of with the court stating it would impose an appropriate sentence if the accused pleads guilty, determined by the case's gravity and circumstances rather than negotiation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 26-Mar-2026

    call on

    4th Additional District Judge

  11. 13-Mar-2026

    For production of accused

    4th Additional District Judge

  12. 02-Mar-2026

    call on

    4th Additional District Judge

  13. 16-Feb-2026

    For production of documents/Affidavit

    4th Additional District Judge

  14. 03-Feb-2026

    For production of accused

    4th Additional District Judge

  15. 21-Jan-2026

    remand Extended

    4th Additional District Judge

  16. 08-Jan-2026

    remand Extended

    4th Additional District Judge

  17. 26-Dec-2025

    remand Extended

    4th Additional District Judge

  18. 12-Dec-2025

    remand Extended

    4th Additional District Judge

  19. 06-Dec-2025

    OrderView PDF

  20. 06-Dec-2025

    call on

    4th Additional District Judge

  21. 03-Dec-2025

    Call with Mp

    4th Additional District Judge

  22. 01-Dec-2025

    remand Extended

    4th Additional District Judge

  23. 17-Nov-2025

    call on

    4th Additional District Judge

  24. 03-Nov-2025

    remand Extended

    4th Additional District Judge

  25. 22-Oct-2025

    remand Extended

    4th Additional District Judge

  26. 21-Oct-2025

    OrderView PDF

  27. 21-Oct-2025

    call on

    4th Additional District Judge

  28. 18-Oct-2025

    Call with Mp

    4th Additional District Judge

  29. 14-Oct-2025

    Call with Mp

    4th Additional District Judge

  30. 07-Oct-2025

    remand Extended

    4th Additional District Judge

  31. 24-Sep-2025

    remand Extended

    4th Additional District Judge

  32. 10-Sep-2025

    remand Extended

    4th Additional District Judge

  33. 27-Aug-2025

    Issue production warrant

    4th Additional District Judge

  34. 13-Aug-2025

    Issue NBW

    4th Additional District Judge

  35. 17-Jul-2025

    Issue Bailable Warrant

    4th Additional District Judge

  36. 03-Jun-2025

    call on

    4th Additional District Judge

  37. 05-May-2025

    call on

    4th Additional District Judge

  38. 03-May-2025

    Issue production warrant

    4th Additional District Judge

  39. 29-Apr-2025

    Orders in Cmp

    4th Additional District Judge

  40. 25-Apr-2025

    remand Extended

    4th Additional District Judge

  41. 22-Apr-2025

    remand Extended

    4th Additional District Judge

  42. 08-Apr-2025

    remand Extended

    4th Additional District Judge

  43. 26-Mar-2025

    remand Extended

    4th Additional District Judge

  44. 13-Mar-2025

    remand Extended

    4th Additional District Judge

  45. 04-Mar-2025

    call on

    4th Additional District Judge

  46. 27-Feb-2025

    Orders in Cmp

    4th Additional District Judge

  47. 24-Feb-2025

    Call with Mp

    4th Additional District Judge

  48. 20-Feb-2025

    Call with Mp

    4th Additional District Judge

  49. 18-Feb-2025

    Call with Mp

    4th Additional District Judge

  50. 07-Feb-2025

    remand Extended

    4th Additional District Judge

  51. 04-Feb-2025

    Hearing on Charge

    4th Additional District Judge

  52. 31-Jan-2025

    Orders in Cmp

    4th Additional District Judge

  53. 29-Jan-2025

    Call with Mp

    4th Additional District Judge

  54. 28-Jan-2025

    Call with Mp

    4th Additional District Judge

  55. 24-Jan-2025

    remand Extended

    4th Additional District Judge

  56. 13-Jan-2025

    remand Extended

    4th Additional District Judge

  57. 31-Dec-2024

    For reports

    4th Additional District Judge

  58. 17-Dec-2024

    Hearing on Charge

    4th Additional District Judge

  59. 04-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  60. 25-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 782/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case 782/2024 Summary Accused Sijo Savier filed criminal miscellaneous petitions from jail seeking a lenient sentence commensurate with his pre-trial detention of over one year, expressing willingness to plead guilty. The court rejected his plea bargaining request, holding that while plea bargaining is permissible, the grave and serious allegations (carrying up to 10 years imprisonment) and the accused's criminal antecedents preclude acceptance of a sentence limited to time already served. The petitions were disposed of with the court stating it would impose an appropriate sentence if the accused pleads guilty, determined by the case's gravity and circumstances rather than negotiation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case