SHO, Payyannur Police Station vs Rajesh P R Advocate - Rashbana Thansi, Rashbana Thansi — 764/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section u/s.109(1),118(2),127(2),326(g) and 238. Status: call on. Next hearing: 10th August 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLKN010042012024
Next Hearing
10th August 2026
Filing Number
1002854/2024
Filing Date
21-11-2024
Registration No
764/2024
Registration Date
21-11-2024
Court
District Court and Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thalassery
Judge
2-1st Additional District Judge
FIR Details
FIR Number
672
Police Station
Payyannur Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHO (Station House Officer), Payyannur Police Station
Respondent(s)
Rajesh P R Advocate - Rashbana Thansi, Rashbana Thansi
Hearing History
Judge: 2-1st Additional District Judge
call on
For evidence.
For evidence.
For evidence.
For evidence.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | call on |
| 02-05-2026 | For evidence. |
| 24-04-2026 | For evidence. |
| 10-04-2026 | For evidence. |
| 28-03-2026 | For evidence. |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: SC No. 764/2024 Outcome: Bail Denied Rajesh P.R.'s bail application under Section 483 BNSS was dismissed. The accused is charged with attempted murder and grievous hurt to his wife and minor son using a chopper on July 23, 2024, allegedly in retaliation for a harassment complaint. The court found credible risk of further violence against the complainant and her children, noting the accused's drug addiction and statements in jail about harming the complainant, warranting continued judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: SC No. 764/2024 Outcome: Bail Denied Rajesh P.R.'s bail application under Section 483 BNSS was dismissed. The accused is charged with attempted murder and grievous hurt to his wife and minor son using a chopper on July 23, 2024, allegedly in retaliation for a harassment complaint. The court found credible risk of further violence against the complainant and her children, noting the accused's drug addiction and statements in jail about harming the complainant, warranting continued judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts