Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd vs Subair.N — 255/2025

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 36. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

EP - EXECUTION PETITION

CNR: KLKN010041022025

Filing Number

26274/2025

Filing Date

21-Oct-2025

Registration No

255/2025

Registration Date

23-Oct-2025

Court

District Court and Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thalassery

Judge

3-2nd Additional District Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 36

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd

    Adv. SHIVAJI D

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Subair.N

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Additional District Judge-II, Thalassery dismissed Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd's execution petition against Subair.N due to the petitioner's absence at the hearing and failure to produce evidence proving the respondent's means. The court found no grounds to proceed with the execution petition under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act and Section 51(c), Order 21 Rule 37 of CPC without such substantiation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Additional District Judge

  4. 06-Feb-2026

    For evidence.

    2nd Additional District Judge

  5. 16-Dec-2025

    For return of summons

    2nd Additional District Judge

  6. 29-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 21-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 255/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional District Judge-II, Thalassery dismissed Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd's execution petition against Subair.N due to the petitioner's absence at the hearing and failure to produce evidence proving the respondent's means. The court found no grounds to proceed with the execution petition under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act and Section 51(c), Order 21 Rule 37 of CPC without such substantiation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case