State of Kerala Police vs Divvya P.P. Advocate - VISWAN — 515/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 108. Status: call on. Next hearing: 27th June 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLKN010037672025
Next Hearing
27th June 2026
Filing Number
515/2025
Filing Date
26-09-2025
Registration No
515/2025
Registration Date
27-09-2025
Court
District Court and Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thalassery
Judge
3-2nd Additional District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala Police
Adv. JAYASREE V S(Additional Govt. Pleader)
Respondent(s)
Divvya P.P. Advocate - VISWAN
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd Additional District Judge
call on
call on
Await report
Orders in CMP
Orders in CMP
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-06-2026 | call on |
| 30-05-2026 | call on |
| 16-03-2026 | Await report |
| 12-03-2026 | Orders in CMP |
| 09-03-2026 | Orders in CMP |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: SC.515/2025 Petitioner: Manjusha K. (wife of deceased ADM Naveen Babu) Respondent: State of Kerala / P.P. Divya (Accused - District Panchayat President) Charge: Abetment of suicide under Section 108 BNS Outcome: Two petitions partially allowed; one dismissed. The court ordered limited further investigation into specific aspects: gold loan records of witness CW43, unedited CCTV visuals from October 6, statements from Vigilance Bureau officers, and the accused's phone call records (CDR) from January-November 2024. However, the court rejected requests for investigating alleged benami transactions, missing partnership deeds, and potential conspiracies between the accused and other officials as being outside the case scope. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: SC.515/2025 Petitioner: Manjusha K. (wife of deceased ADM Naveen Babu) Respondent: State of Kerala / P.P. Divya (Accused - District Panchayat President) Charge: Abetment of suicide under Section 108 BNS Outcome: Two petitions partially allowed; one dismissed. The court ordered limited further investigation into specific aspects: gold loan records of witness CW43, unedited CCTV visuals from October 6, statements from Vigilance Bureau officers, and the accused's phone call records (CDR) from January-November 2024. However, the court rejected requests for investigating alleged benami transactions, missing partnership deeds, and potential conspiracies between the accused and other officials as being outside the case scope. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts