State of Kerala Police vs Mahesh Hasda Advocate - Anjana P, Anjana P, Anjana PRESHMA.C, — 413/2025
Case under Juvenile Justice (care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 Section 74,75(1) BNS. Status: For further hearing. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLKN010032232025
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
Filing Number
2205/2025
Filing Date
11-08-2025
Registration No
413/2025
Registration Date
12-08-2025
Court
District Court and Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thalassery
Judge
2-1st Additional District Judge
FIR Details
FIR Number
319
Police Station
Chokli Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala Police
Adv. JAYARAMDAS E(Additional Public Prosecutor)
Respondent(s)
Mahesh Hasda Advocate - Anjana P, Anjana P, Anjana PRESHMA.C,
Hearing History
Judge: 2-1st Additional District Judge
For further hearing
remand Extended
remand Extended
Defence Evidence
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-05-2026 | For further hearing |
| 11-05-2026 | remand Extended |
| 27-04-2026 | remand Extended |
| 20-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 13-04-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Interim Orders
Summary: The bail application filed by Mahesh Hasda under Section 483 of BNSS was dismissed. The court found merit in the prosecution's apprehension that the accused, a migrant worker from Nepal charged with offences under Sections 74 and 75(1) of BNS (sexual assault), had absconded after the alleged incident and posed a flight risk if released on bail. The court declined to grant bail despite the accused having no criminal antecedents and spending 89 days in judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The bail application filed by Mahesh Hasda under Section 483 of BNSS was dismissed. The court found merit in the prosecution's apprehension that the accused, a migrant worker from Nepal charged with offences under Sections 74 and 75(1) of BNS (sexual assault), had absconded after the alleged incident and posed a flight risk if released on bail. The court declined to grant bail despite the accused having no criminal antecedents and spending 89 days in judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts