Spl Tahsildar vs Kulangareth Narayanan Nair (late) Advocate - SHIJA K M1. — 25/2024

Case under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Compensation, Rehabilitation & Resettlement and Development Plan) Rules, 2015 Section 3(H)4ofNHAct1956. Disposed: Contested--AWARD PASSED on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

LAR(NHA) - LAND ACQUISITION REFERENCE (NHA)

CNR: KLKN010027882024

e-Filing Number

01-08-2024

Filing Number

911/2024

Filing Date

09-Aug-2024

Registration No

25/2024

Registration Date

09-Aug-2024

Court

District Court and Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thalassery

Judge

3-2nd Additional District Judge

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--AWARD PASSED

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Compensation, Rehabilitation & Resettlement and Development Plan) Rules, 2015 Section 3(H)4ofNHAct1956

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Spl Tahsildar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kulangareth Narayanan Nair (late) Advocate - SHIJA K M1.

  2. 2.C K Devi

    Adv. SHIJA K M1.

  3. 3.Jayasheela C K

    Adv. SHIJA K M1.

  4. 4.Geetharani

    Adv. SHIJA K M1.

  5. 5.Mini

    Adv. SHIJA K M1.

  6. 6.Sunil Kumar C K

    Adv. SHIJA K M

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    AwardView PDF

    Summary The Additional District Judge-II, Thalassery held that respondents 1-5 (legal heirs of Kulangarath Narayanan Nair) are entitled to the ₹21,74,744 land acquisition compensation awarded for 0.0695 hectares acquired for National Highway 66 development, rejecting the Kalarivathukkal Devaswom temple's competing claim. The court found that tenants had possessed the property since before 1923 under registered documents, the Land Tribunal's 1976 purchase certificate conclusively proved absolute title, and statutory restrictions on temple property alienation lacked retrospective effect to divest the tenants' vested rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Additional District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    2nd Additional District Judge

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    2nd Additional District Judge

  6. 28-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    2nd Additional District Judge

  7. 24-Jan-2026

    For evidence.

    2nd Additional District Judge

  8. 14-Oct-2025

    For evidence.

    2nd Additional District Judge

  9. 14-Aug-2025

    For evidence.

    2nd Additional District Judge

  10. 05-Jul-2025

    For evidence.

    2nd Additional District Judge

  11. 13-Jun-2025

    For evidence.

    2nd Additional District Judge

  12. 09-Jun-2025

    For claim statement

    2nd Additional District Judge

  13. 07-Jun-2025

    Orders in IA

    2nd Additional District Judge

  14. 04-Jun-2025

    Orders in IA

    2nd Additional District Judge

  15. 21-Mar-2025

    For counter

    2nd Additional District Judge

  16. 22-Feb-2025

    For evidence.

    2nd Additional District Judge

  17. 31-Jan-2025

    For evidence.

    2nd Additional District Judge

  18. 20-Dec-2024

    For evidence.

    2nd Additional District Judge

  19. 18-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 09-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 25/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional District Judge-II, Thalassery held that respondents 1-5 (legal heirs of Kulangarath Narayanan Nair) are entitled to the ₹21,74,744 land acquisition compensation awarded for 0.0695 hectares acquired for National Highway 66 development, rejecting the Kalarivathukkal Devaswom temple's competing claim. The court found that tenants had possessed the property since before 1923 under registered documents, the Land Tribunal's 1976 purchase certificate conclusively proved absolute title, and statutory restrictions on temple property alienation lacked retrospective effect to divest the tenants' vested rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case