Special Tahsildar vs Chinnan K Advocate - SHIJA K M — 2/2024
Case under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (compensation, Rehabilitation & Resettlement and Development Plan) Rules, 2015 Section 3H(4)NHACT1956. Disposed: Contested--AWARD PASSED on 30th March 2026.
LAR(NHA) - LAND ACQUISITION REFERENCE (NHA)
CNR: KLKN010024822024
e-Filing Number
03-07-2024
Filing Number
779/2024
Filing Date
15-07-2024
Registration No
2/2024
Registration Date
24-07-2024
Court
District Court and Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thalassery
Judge
3-2nd Additional District Judge
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--AWARD PASSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Special Tahsildar
Adv. District Government Pleader
Respondent(s)
Chinnan K Advocate - SHIJA K M
K Vijyaraghavan
Adv. SHIJA K M
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd Additional District Judge
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 24-02-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 28-01-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 16-12-2025 | FOR HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional District Judge-II, Thalassery awarded land acquisition compensation of ₹22,87,393 to respondents Chinnan K and K. Vijayaraghavan in equal shares, rejecting the Chirakkal Kovilakam Devaswam temple's claim to the property. The court held that while the property originally belonged to the temple, tenants possessed it prior to 1927 enactment of Hindu Religious Endowment Act restrictions; therefore, the temple's exemption claim was inapplicable, and the respondents' 1976 Land Tribunal purchase certificate established their conclusive title and ownership at the time of acquisition for National Highway 66 development. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional District Judge-II, Thalassery awarded land acquisition compensation of ₹22,87,393 to respondents Chinnan K and K. Vijayaraghavan in equal shares, rejecting the Chirakkal Kovilakam Devaswam temple's claim to the property. The court held that while the property originally belonged to the temple, tenants possessed it prior to 1927 enactment of Hindu Religious Endowment Act restrictions; therefore, the temple's exemption claim was inapplicable, and the respondents' 1976 Land Tribunal purchase certificate established their conclusive title and ownership at the time of acquisition for National Highway 66 development. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts