Usha Parayil vs C P Damodaran Advocate - UMMER K, K Ummer, K UmmerSHYAMA A,, K UmmerSHYAMA A,HAROON RASHEED, — 5/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 408. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.MP(TP) - CRIMINAL TRANSFER PETITION

CNR: KLKN010006032026

Filing Number

4/2026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

5/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Court

District Court and Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thalassery

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 408

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Usha Parayil

    Adv. A S Madhu Soodanan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.C P Damodaran Advocate - UMMER K, K Ummer, K UmmerSHYAMA A,, K UmmerSHYAMA A,HAROON RASHEED,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Court dismissed Usha Parayil's petition to transfer her domestic violence case from Grama Nyayalaya, Irikkur to Kannur court. The court found insufficient grounds for transfer, noting that Irikkur is actually closer to her residence (10km) than Kannur (27km), and rejected arguments about lawyer availability and costs, directing her to seek legal aid through DLSA instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    For counter

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Issue notice

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    call on

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  8. 09-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Court dismissed Usha Parayil's petition to transfer her domestic violence case from Grama Nyayalaya, Irikkur to Kannur court. The court found insufficient grounds for transfer, noting that Irikkur is actually closer to her residence (10km) than Kannur (27km), and rejected arguments about lawyer availability and costs, directing her to seek legal aid through DLSA instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case