Mailanhikkal Kalathil Shahul Hameed vs Pandariveettil Vijayan — 15/2023
Case under Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 (Kerala) Section 18. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.
RCA - CIVIL APPEAL (RENT CONTROL)
CNR: KLKN010003882023
e-Filing Number
20-01-2023
Filing Number
217/2023
Filing Date
30-01-2023
Registration No
15/2023
Registration Date
01-02-2023
Court
District Court and Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thalassery
Judge
5-4th Additional District Judge
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mailanhikkal Kalathil Shahul Hameed
Adv. Martin Thomas
Respondent(s)
Pandariveettil Vijayan
Hearing History
Judge: 5-4th Additional District Judge
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 23-02-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 17-02-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 11-02-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Rent Control Appeal No. 15/2023 The Kerala Rent Control Appellate Authority partly allowed the landlord's appeal, revising the fair rent of a commercial property in Taliparamba from Rs.800/month (fixed in 1993) to Rs.2,000/month. While acknowledging the property's commercially prominent location near the National Highway and noting inflation's impact on the original rent, the court rejected the landlord's claim for Rs.6,000/month due to the building's dilapidated condition and lack of basic amenities (parking, toilet facilities), instead relying on comparable rents of Rs.2,000-4,000 in the same complex. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Rent Control Appeal No. 15/2023 The Kerala Rent Control Appellate Authority partly allowed the landlord's appeal, revising the fair rent of a commercial property in Taliparamba from Rs.800/month (fixed in 1993) to Rs.2,000/month. While acknowledging the property's commercially prominent location near the National Highway and noting inflation's impact on the original rent, the court rejected the landlord's claim for Rs.6,000/month due to the building's dilapidated condition and lack of basic amenities (parking, toilet facilities), instead relying on comparable rents of Rs.2,000-4,000 in the same complex. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts