Mailanhikkal Kalathil Shahul Hameed vs Pandariveettil Vijayan — 15/2023

Case under Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 (Kerala) Section 18. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

RCA - CIVIL APPEAL (RENT CONTROL)

CNR: KLKN010003882023

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

20-01-2023

Filing Number

217/2023

Filing Date

30-01-2023

Registration No

15/2023

Registration Date

01-02-2023

Court

District Court and Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thalassery

Judge

5-4th Additional District Judge

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 (Kerala) Section 18

Petitioner(s)

Mailanhikkal Kalathil Shahul Hameed

Adv. Martin Thomas

Respondent(s)

Pandariveettil Vijayan

Hearing History

Judge: 5-4th Additional District Judge

18-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Order/ Judgement

23-02-2026

Order/ Judgement

17-02-2026

FOR HEARING

11-02-2026

FOR HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
Judgement

Case Summary: Rent Control Appeal No. 15/2023 The Kerala Rent Control Appellate Authority partly allowed the landlord's appeal, revising the fair rent of a commercial property in Taliparamba from Rs.800/month (fixed in 1993) to Rs.2,000/month. While acknowledging the property's commercially prominent location near the National Highway and noting inflation's impact on the original rent, the court rejected the landlord's claim for Rs.6,000/month due to the building's dilapidated condition and lack of basic amenities (parking, toilet facilities), instead relying on comparable rents of Rs.2,000-4,000 in the same complex. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Rent Control Appeal No. 15/2023 The Kerala Rent Control Appellate Authority partly allowed the landlord's appeal, revising the fair rent of a commercial property in Taliparamba from Rs.800/month (fixed in 1993) to Rs.2,000/month. While acknowledging the property's commercially prominent location near the National Highway and noting inflation's impact on the original rent, the court rejected the landlord's claim for Rs.6,000/month due to the building's dilapidated condition and lack of basic amenities (parking, toilet facilities), instead relying on comparable rents of Rs.2,000-4,000 in the same complex. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Court and Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thalassery All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case