Shamna C P vs Muhammed Asharaf Advocate - Pramod Kumar K — 37/2026

Case under Guardians and Wards Act Section 7. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 26th May 2026.

OP - ORIGINAL PETITION

CNR: KLKN010003192026

Case disposed

Filing Number

37/2026

Filing Date

04-12-2025

Registration No

37/2026

Registration Date

22-01-2026

Court

District Court and Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thalassery

Judge

4-3rd Additional District Judge

Decision Date

26th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

GUARDIANS AND WARDS ACT Section 7
IA/1/2026 Classification : Petition to appoint guardian Section Shamna C P

Petitioner(s)

Shamna C P

Adv. Sivadasan Vengayil

Respondent(s)

Muhammed Asharaf Advocate - Pramod Kumar K

Hearing History

Judge: 4-3rd Additional District Judge

26-05-2026

Disposed

23-05-2026

Order/ Judgement

24-03-2026

For evidence.

16-03-2026

For evidence.

28-01-2026

Issue notice

Final Orders / Judgements

26-05-2026
Order

The court partially allowed the petition, appointing Shamna C P as guardian of the property (but not person) of two minor children and permitting her to sell their inherited shares in joint property valued at ₹3,12,000 per acre. The sale proceeds must be deposited in a nationalized bank in the minors' names with court lien, withdrawal restricted until majority except for interest used for educational, medical, and maintenance expenses, and the petitioner must execute a ₹1,00,000 bond within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court partially allowed the petition, appointing Shamna C P as guardian of the property (but not person) of two minor children and permitting her to sell their inherited shares in joint property valued at ₹3,12,000 per acre. The sale proceeds must be deposited in a nationalized bank in the minors' names with court lien, withdrawal restricted until majority except for interest used for educational, medical, and maintenance expenses, and the petitioner must execute a ₹1,00,000 bond within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Court and Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thalassery All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case