Shamna C P vs Muhammed Asharaf Advocate - Pramod Kumar K — 37/2026
Case under Guardians and Wards Act Section 7. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 26th May 2026.
OP - ORIGINAL PETITION
CNR: KLKN010003192026
Filing Number
37/2026
Filing Date
04-Dec-2025
Registration No
37/2026
Registration Date
22-Jan-2026
Court
District Court and Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thalassery
Judge
4-3rd Additional District Judge
Decision Date
26-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shamna C P
Adv. Sivadasan Vengayil
Respondent(s)
-
1.Muhammed Asharaf Advocate - Pramod Kumar K
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-May-2026
OrderView PDF
The court partially allowed the petition, appointing Shamna C P as guardian of the property (but not person) of two minor children and permitting her to sell their inherited shares in joint property valued at ₹3,12,000 per acre. The sale proceeds must be deposited in a nationalized bank in the minors' names with court lien, withdrawal restricted until majority except for interest used for educational, medical, and maintenance expenses, and the petitioner must execute a ₹1,00,000 bond within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-May-2026
Disposed
3rd Additional District Judge
-
23-May-2026
Order/ Judgement
3rd Additional District Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
For evidence.
3rd Additional District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
For evidence.
3rd Additional District Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 37/2026
The court partially allowed the petition, appointing Shamna C P as guardian of the property (but not person) of two minor children and permitting her to sell their inherited shares in joint property valued at ₹3,12,000 per acre. The sale proceeds must be deposited in a nationalized bank in the minors' names with court lien, withdrawal restricted until majority except for interest used for educational, medical, and maintenance expenses, and the petitioner must execute a ₹1,00,000 bond within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts