Saneesh.P.K. vs Kannoth Jithesh — 1/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 19th March 2026.

Crl.RP (Calendar) - CALENDAR REVISION PETITION

CNR: KLKN010001522026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1/2026

Filing Date

09-01-2026

Registration No

1/2026

Registration Date

14-01-2026

Court

District Court and Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thalassery

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

19th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438
Crl.MP/1/2026 Classification : Petition Section Saneesh.P.K.Kannoth Jithesh
Crl.MP/2/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section Saneesh.P.K.Kannoth Jithesh

Petitioner(s)

Saneesh.P.K.

Adv. Sunil Kumar T

Respondent(s)

Kannoth Jithesh

State

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

19-03-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

Order/ Judgement

16-03-2026

Order/ Judgement

09-03-2026

Order/ Judgement

27-02-2026

FOR HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

19-03-2026
Order

Case Summary: Saneesh.P.K. v. Kannoth Jithesh (Criminal Revision Petition 1/2026) The Sessions Court at Thalassery allowed Saneesh's revision petition and set aside the lower court's order denying him permission to reopen evidence in a cheque bounce case (Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act). Saneesh, the complainant, had claimed he lent money to Kannoth Jithesh using a ₹2,50,000 bank loan, but wanted to adduce further evidence that the loan was actually taken in his mother's name—contradicting his earlier testimony. The court held that parties deserve sufficient opportunity to present evidence for fair trials, and the proposed evidence was germane to the case, though acceptance remained discretionary for the trial court. The petition was allowed conditionally, requiring Saneesh to pay ₹5,000 to the respondent and ₹3,000 witness fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

14-01-2026
Order
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Saneesh.P.K. v. Kannoth Jithesh (Criminal Revision Petition 1/2026) The Sessions Court at Thalassery allowed Saneesh's revision petition and set aside the lower court's order denying him permission to reopen evidence in a cheque bounce case (Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act). Saneesh, the complainant, had claimed he lent money to Kannoth Jithesh using a ₹2,50,000 bank loan, but wanted to adduce further evidence that the loan was actually taken in his mother's name—contradicting his earlier testimony. The court held that parties deserve sufficient opportunity to present evidence for fair trials, and the proposed evidence was germane to the case, though acceptance remained discretionary for the trial court. The petition was allowed conditionally, requiring Saneesh to pay ₹5,000 to the respondent and ₹3,000 witness fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Court and Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thalassery All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case