Saneesh.P.K. vs Kannoth Jithesh — 1/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.RP (Calendar) - CALENDAR REVISION PETITION

CNR: KLKN010001522026

Filing Number

1/2026

Filing Date

09-Jan-2026

Registration No

1/2026

Registration Date

14-Jan-2026

Court

District Court and Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thalassery

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Saneesh.P.K.

    Adv. Sunil Kumar T

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kannoth Jithesh

  2. 2.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Saneesh.P.K. v. Kannoth Jithesh (Criminal Revision Petition 1/2026) The Sessions Court at Thalassery allowed Saneesh's revision petition and set aside the lower court's order denying him permission to reopen evidence in a cheque bounce case (Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act). Saneesh, the complainant, had claimed he lent money to Kannoth Jithesh using a ₹2,50,000 bank loan, but wanted to adduce further evidence that the loan was actually taken in his mother's name—contradicting his earlier testimony. The court held that parties deserve sufficient opportunity to present evidence for fair trials, and the proposed evidence was germane to the case, though acceptance remained discretionary for the trial court. The petition was allowed conditionally, requiring Saneesh to pay ₹5,000 to the respondent and ₹3,000 witness fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  8. 27-Jan-2026

    Issue notice

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  9. 14-Jan-2026

    OrderView PDF

  10. 14-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 09-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Saneesh.P.K. v. Kannoth Jithesh (Criminal Revision Petition 1/2026) The Sessions Court at Thalassery allowed Saneesh's revision petition and set aside the lower court's order denying him permission to reopen evidence in a cheque bounce case (Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act). Saneesh, the complainant, had claimed he lent money to Kannoth Jithesh using a ₹2,50,000 bank loan, but wanted to adduce further evidence that the loan was actually taken in his mother's name—contradicting his earlier testimony. The court held that parties deserve sufficient opportunity to present evidence for fair trials, and the proposed evidence was germane to the case, though acceptance remained discretionary for the trial court. The petition was allowed conditionally, requiring Saneesh to pay ₹5,000 to the respondent and ₹3,000 witness fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case