Assistant Labour Officer vs Anilkumar — 100472/2019

Case under Minimum Wages Act Section 22(A). Disposed: Uncontested--DISCHARGED on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

ST - SUMMARY TRIAL

CNR: KLKM360003492019

Filing Number

100472/2019

Filing Date

03-Dec-2019

Registration No

100472/2019

Registration Date

03-Dec-2019

Court

Gram Nyayalaya, Chadayamangalam

Judge

1-Nyayadhikari

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISCHARGED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Minimum Wages Act Section 22(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Assistant Labour Officer

    Adv. Mithra. J

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Anilkumar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Gram Nyayalaya discharged accused Anil Kumar in a Minimum Wages Act violation case (ST. 472/2019) because the employer company (Krishna Milma Basar & Bakery) was not made an accused. The court found it mandatory under precedent to array the company as an accused in such labor law violations, and therefore discharged the individual accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Nyayadhikari

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Issue NBW

    Nyayadhikari

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Issue Bailable Warrant

    Nyayadhikari

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari

  7. 29-Jan-2026

    Repeat Summons

    Nyayadhikari

  8. 17-Jan-2026

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari

  9. 04-Dec-2025

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari

  10. 28-Oct-2025

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari

  11. 25-Sep-2025

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari

  12. 04-Aug-2025

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari

  13. 20-Jun-2025

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari

  14. 06-May-2025

    Issue notice

    Nyayadhikari

  15. 11-Apr-2025

    Issue notice

    Nyayadhikari

  16. 03-Apr-2025

    Repeat Summons

    Nyayadhikari

  17. 12-Feb-2025

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari

  18. 28-Dec-2024

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari

  19. 06-Nov-2024

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari

  20. 02-Sep-2024

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari

  21. 09-Jul-2024

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari

  22. 21-May-2024

    Repeat Summons

    Nyayadhikari

  23. 26-Feb-2024

    Issue summonsed to accused

    Nyayadhikari

  24. 22-Jan-2024

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari

  25. 06-Nov-2023

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari

  26. 12-Sep-2023

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari

  27. 21-Jun-2023

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari

  28. 08-Mar-2023

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari

  29. 26-Dec-2022

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari

  30. 27-Oct-2022

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari

  31. 23-Aug-2022

    Return of summons

    Nyayadhikari

  32. 29-Jun-2022

    Return of summons

    Nyayadhikari

  33. 06-May-2022

    Return of summons

    Nyayadhikari

  34. 05-Mar-2022

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari

  35. 23-Dec-2021

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari

  36. 07-Oct-2021

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari

  37. 19-Jul-2021

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari

  38. 10-May-2021

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari

  39. 26-Feb-2021

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari

  40. 17-Dec-2020

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari

  41. 27-Oct-2020

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari

  42. 08-Sep-2020

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari

  43. 27-Jul-2020

    Call on

    Nyayadhikari

  44. 04-May-2020

    Issue summonsed to accused

    Nyayadhikari

  45. 02-Mar-2020

    Issue summonsed to accused

    Nyayadhikari

  46. 20-Jan-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  47. 03-Dec-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100472/2019

casestatus.in Summary

The Gram Nyayalaya discharged accused Anil Kumar in a Minimum Wages Act violation case (ST. 472/2019) because the employer company (Krishna Milma Basar & Bakery) was not made an accused. The court found it mandatory under precedent to array the company as an accused in such labor law violations, and therefore discharged the individual accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case