Sub Inspector of Police vs Shan Vahab Advocate - V.Ajimon — 100399/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,294(b),323,506(1),34. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 28th April 2026.
ST - SUMMARY TRIAL
CNR: KLKM360000332018
Filing Number
100399/2018
Filing Date
31-07-2018
Registration No
100399/2018
Registration Date
31-07-2018
Court
Gram Nyayalaya, Chadayamangalam
Judge
1-Nyayadhikari
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
1739
Police Station
Kadakkal
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sub Inspector of Police
Adv. Mithra. J
Respondent(s)
Shan Vahab Advocate - V.Ajimon
Sudheer
Adv. V.Ajimon
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Nyayadhikari
Disposed
FOR HEARING
82-83 Steps
NBW to cws
Issue Bailable Warrant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-04-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 13-04-2026 | 82-83 Steps |
| 27-03-2026 | NBW to cws |
| 13-03-2026 | Issue Bailable Warrant |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: ST 399/2018 Court Decision: The Kadaykkala Village Court acquitted the first accused (Shan Vahab) on 28 April 2026, finding him not guilty of charges under IPC Sections 341, 294(b), 323, 506(I), and 34. The accused was released unconditionally, and his bail bond was cancelled. The case against the second accused (Sudheer) was re-filed as ST 557/2018. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove the charges as it presented no witnesses to support allegations that the accused unlawfully restrained the complainant, used abusive language, caused hurt, and threatened the complainant. Due to complete absence of prosecution evidence, the court found reasonable doubt and acquitted the accused under CrPC Section 255(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: ST 399/2018 Court Decision: The Kadaykkala Village Court acquitted the first accused (Shan Vahab) on 28 April 2026, finding him not guilty of charges under IPC Sections 341, 294(b), 323, 506(I), and 34. The accused was released unconditionally, and his bail bond was cancelled. The case against the second accused (Sudheer) was re-filed as ST 557/2018. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove the charges as it presented no witnesses to support allegations that the accused unlawfully restrained the complainant, used abusive language, caused hurt, and threatened the complainant. Due to complete absence of prosecution evidence, the court found reasonable doubt and acquitted the accused under CrPC Section 255(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts