State of Kerala (Police) vs DEEPU — 101706/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 392,34. Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 271 BNSS on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLKM350027982021

Filing Number

101706/2021

Filing Date

24-Dec-2021

Registration No

101706/2021

Registration Date

12-Jan-2022

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kadakkal

Judge

1-Judl First Class Magistrate

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 271 BNSS

Last updated 30-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1459

Police Station

Kadakkal

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 392,34
Crl.mp/1720/2025 Classification : Petition Section State of Kerala (Police)ARUN

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Kerala (Police)

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DEEPU

  2. 2.ARUN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Deepu and Arun (101706/2021) Accused Deepu and Arun were charged under IPC Section 392 r/w 34 (theft) for allegedly stealing a gold chain from an intoxicated complainant on October 7, 2021. The court acquitted both accused, finding them not guilty. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient evidence—the complainant testified he did not know the culprits, key material witnesses could not be procured despite coercive steps, and the sole prosecution witness's testimony did not advance the case. The court closed prosecution evidence and discharged the accused under Section 248(1) CrPC, cancelling their bail bonds and releasing them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-May-2026

    Disposed

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  4. 08-May-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  5. 30-Apr-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  6. 29-Apr-2026

    Prays time

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    For Steps

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  8. 30-Jan-2026

    For return of summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  9. 15-Jan-2026

    No sitting notified

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  10. 15-Dec-2025

    Repeat Summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  11. 03-Nov-2025

    Repeat Summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  12. 30-Oct-2025

    For Orders in Ea

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  13. 28-Oct-2025

    Return of warrant

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  14. 21-Oct-2025

    Await report

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  15. 07-Aug-2025

    repeat NBW

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  16. 11-Jun-2025

    Repeat Summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  17. 02-Apr-2025

    Repeat Summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  18. 21-Jan-2025

    Issue Summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  19. 07-Oct-2024

    Issue Summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  20. 02-Aug-2024

    No sitting notified

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  21. 15-May-2024

    No sitting notified

  22. 16-Feb-2024

    Return of summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  23. 20-Nov-2023

    Return of summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  24. 25-Aug-2023

    Return of summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  25. 10-Jul-2023

    Return of summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  26. 21-Mar-2023

    Return of summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  27. 15-Dec-2022

    Return of summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  28. 10-Oct-2022

    Return of summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  29. 12-Jul-2022

    Return of summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  30. 23-Mar-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 24-Dec-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 101706/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Deepu and Arun (101706/2021) Accused Deepu and Arun were charged under IPC Section 392 r/w 34 (theft) for allegedly stealing a gold chain from an intoxicated complainant on October 7, 2021. The court acquitted both accused, finding them not guilty. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient evidence—the complainant testified he did not know the culprits, key material witnesses could not be procured despite coercive steps, and the sole prosecution witness's testimony did not advance the case. The court closed prosecution evidence and discharged the accused under Section 248(1) CrPC, cancelling their bail bonds and releasing them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case