State of Kerala (Police) vs ANILKUMAR — 100757/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 427,324,323,294(b),34. Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 271 BNSS on 14th May 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKM350024792023
e-Filing Number
22-05-2023
Filing Number
2479/2023
Filing Date
31-07-2023
Registration No
100757/2023
Registration Date
31-07-2023
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kadakkal
Judge
1-Judl First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
14th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 271 BNSS
FIR Details
FIR Number
392
Police Station
Chithara Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Respondent(s)
ANILKUMAR
ATHULYA
BINDHU
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judl First Class Magistrate
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Appearance Of Parties
Report on mediation
For reports
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-05-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 24-04-2026 | Appearance Of Parties |
| 31-03-2026 | Report on mediation |
| 12-03-2026 | For reports |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 100757/2023 (Kadakkal Magistrate Court) The court acquitted Anil Kumar, Athulya, and Bindhu of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 324, and 427 r/w 34, arising from an alleged April 2023 assault incident in Mancode Village. The prosecution's case collapsed due to the absence of crucial material witnesses (CW2 and CW3), whose attendance could not be secured despite coercive measures. With only two prosecution witnesses examined and their evidence insufficient to substantiate the allegations, the court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The accused were acquitted and released, with bail bonds cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 100757/2023 (Kadakkal Magistrate Court) The court acquitted Anil Kumar, Athulya, and Bindhu of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 324, and 427 r/w 34, arising from an alleged April 2023 assault incident in Mancode Village. The prosecution's case collapsed due to the absence of crucial material witnesses (CW2 and CW3), whose attendance could not be secured despite coercive measures. With only two prosecution witnesses examined and their evidence insufficient to substantiate the allegations, the court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The accused were acquitted and released, with bail bonds cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts