State of Kerala (Police) vs Vishnupriya Advocate - D.VINAYAKUMAR — 100863/2017

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420, 419, 34. Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLKM350023162017

Filing Number

100863/2017

Filing Date

30-May-2017

Registration No

100863/2017

Registration Date

30-May-2017

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kadakkal

Judge

1-Judl First Class Magistrate

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--AQUITTED

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1600

Police Station

Chadayamangalam

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 420, 419, 34
Crl.mp/2168/2025 Classification : Advance Application Section VishnupriyaState of Kerala (Police)
Crl.mp/2179/2025 Classification : Bail Application Section VishnupriyaState of Kerala (Police)
Crl.mp/2180/2025 Classification : Warrant Recall Petition Section VishnupriyaState of Kerala (Police)
Crl.mp/1/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section VishnupriyaState of Kerala (Police)
Crl.mp/2/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section VishnupriyaState of Kerala (Police)
Crl.mp/3/2026 Classification : Warrant Recall Petition Section VishnupriyaState of Kerala (Police)
Crl.mp/4/2026 Classification : Bail Application Section VishnupriyaState of Kerala (Police)
Crl.mp/5/2026 Classification : Petition Section VishnupriyaState of Kerala (Police)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Kerala (Police)

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vishnupriya Advocate - D.VINAYAKUMAR

  2. 2.Ramachanran Pillai

    Adv. G.BIJU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: Calendar Case No. 863/2017 Court Decision: Accused No. 2 (Ramachandran Pillai) was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 419 (cheating by personation) and 420 (cheating) r/w 34, finding the prosecution failed to prove dishonest intention or personation beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that while Accused No. 2 introduced Accused No. 1 and facilitated transactions, evidence showed he merely acted as an intermediary—all receipts were signed exclusively by Accused No. 1, money was immediately handed over to her, and he derived no financial benefit. The court reasoned cross-examination evidence probabilised the defence that Accused No. 2 himself may have been deceived, particularly given his local reputation and witness admissions that they trusted the transaction based on his standing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  4. 25-May-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  5. 20-May-2026

    For Hearing

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  6. 19-May-2026

    For Hearing

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  7. 13-May-2026

    For Hearing

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  8. 05-May-2026

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  9. 29-Apr-2026

    Appearance Of Parties

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  10. 27-Apr-2026

    To summon witness

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  11. 22-Apr-2026

    NBW to cws

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  12. 16-Apr-2026

    No sitting notified

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  13. 30-Mar-2026

    To summon witness

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  14. 18-Mar-2026

    No sitting notified

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  15. 23-Feb-2026

    To summon witness

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  16. 16-Feb-2026

    No sitting notified

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  17. 28-Jan-2026

    Repeat Summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  18. 08-Jan-2026

    Issue NBW

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  19. 19-Dec-2025

    Issue Summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  20. 18-Dec-2025

    For framing charge

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  21. 16-Dec-2025

    Issue Summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  22. 02-Dec-2025

    repeat NBW

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  23. 24-Nov-2025

    Issue NBW

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  24. 07-Nov-2025

    Await report

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  25. 29-Oct-2025

    Await report

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  26. 26-Sep-2025

    Issue NBW

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  27. 15-Sep-2025

    Issue Bailable Warrant

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  28. 20-Aug-2025

    Issue NBW

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  29. 18-Jul-2025

    repeat NBW

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  30. 01-Jul-2025

    repeat NBW

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  31. 16-Jun-2025

    Issue Bailable Warrant

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  32. 06-May-2025

    No sitting notified

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  33. 08-Apr-2025

    repeat NBW

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  34. 20-Mar-2025

    repeat NBW

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  35. 06-Mar-2025

    Issue Bailable Warrant

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  36. 13-Feb-2025

    Await report

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  37. 11-Feb-2025

    Issue Summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  38. 13-Jan-2025

    Return of summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  39. 09-Dec-2024

    Return of summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  40. 26-Sep-2024

    Return of summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  41. 09-Aug-2024

    Return of summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  42. 08-Jul-2024

    Return of summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  43. 17-Apr-2024

    Repeat Summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  44. 24-Jan-2024

    Repeat Summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  45. 18-Oct-2023

    Repeat Summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  46. 09-Aug-2023

    Repeat Summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  47. 03-May-2023

    Repeat Summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  48. 25-Jan-2023

    Repeat Summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  49. 10-Nov-2022

    Repeat Summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  50. 02-Sep-2022

    Repeat Summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  51. 29-Jun-2022

    Repeat Summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  52. 13-May-2022

    Repeat Summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  53. 22-Jan-2022

    Repeat Summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  54. 06-Nov-2021

    Repeat Summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  55. 02-Aug-2021

    Repeat Summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  56. 20-Apr-2021

    Repeat Summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  57. 11-Jan-2021

    Repeat Summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  58. 21-Oct-2020

    Repeat Summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  59. 28-Apr-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  60. 30-May-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100863/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Calendar Case No. 863/2017 Court Decision: Accused No. 2 (Ramachandran Pillai) was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 419 (cheating by personation) and 420 (cheating) r/w 34, finding the prosecution failed to prove dishonest intention or personation beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that while Accused No. 2 introduced Accused No. 1 and facilitated transactions, evidence showed he merely acted as an intermediary—all receipts were signed exclusively by Accused No. 1, money was immediately handed over to her, and he derived no financial benefit. The court reasoned cross-examination evidence probabilised the defence that Accused No. 2 himself may have been deceived, particularly given his local reputation and witness admissions that they trusted the transaction based on his standing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case