State of Kerala (Police) vs SHEBEEB — 100665/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 336. Status: No sitting notified. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLKM350022922023

No sitting notified

Next Hearing

17th July 2026

e-Filing Number

13-07-2023

Filing Number

2292/2023

Filing Date

13-07-2023

Registration No

100665/2023

Registration Date

13-07-2023

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kadakkal

Judge

1-Judl First Class Magistrate

FIR Details

FIR Number

805

Police Station

Chadayamangalam

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

IPC Section 336
Motor Vehicle Act \ Section 180,5,199A(2),199A(1)
Crl.MP/1/2026 Classification : Petition Section SHEBEEBState of Kerala (Police)

Petitioner(s)

State of Kerala (Police)

Respondent(s)

SHEBEEB

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judl First Class Magistrate

28-05-2026

No sitting notified

25-04-2026

Appearance of Accused

13-03-2026

To record plea of the accused

12-03-2026

Orders in IA

20-02-2026

For objecting & hearing CMP

Interim Orders

13-03-2026
Order

Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Shebeeb (100665/2023) The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kadakkal, partially allowed Shebeeb's discharge petition on March 13, 2026. The accused was discharged from Section 336 IPC charges (rash/negligent act endangering life), as the prosecution's own case showed his minor son drove the vehicle, with no rash act attributable to the accused himself. However, the petition was dismissed regarding Motor Vehicles Act Sections 180 and 199A(1)&(2) offenses (permitting unlicensed driving), which require evidentiary examination at trial. The case proceeds for the remaining offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Shebeeb (100665/2023) The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kadakkal, partially allowed Shebeeb's discharge petition on March 13, 2026. The accused was discharged from Section 336 IPC charges (rash/negligent act endangering life), as the prosecution's own case showed his minor son drove the vehicle, with no rash act attributable to the accused himself. However, the petition was dismissed regarding Motor Vehicles Act Sections 180 and 199A(1)&(2) offenses (permitting unlicensed driving), which require evidentiary examination at trial. The case proceeds for the remaining offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kadakkal All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case