State of Kerala (Police) vs Faihas — 101519/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 381,411,201,34. Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 271 BNSS on 23rd March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKM350022592021
Filing Number
101519/2021
Filing Date
22-Oct-2021
Registration No
101519/2021
Registration Date
22-Oct-2021
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kadakkal
Judge
1-Judl First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 271 BNSS
Last updated 30-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
149
Police Station
Chadayamangalam
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Kerala (Police)
Adv. APP, APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Faihas
-
2.Muhammed Jubin
-
3.Muhammed Ashiq
-
4.Athul
-
5.Sheeja
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
The Judicial First-Class Magistrate, Kadakkal acquitted all five accused (Faihas, Muhammed Jubin, Muhammed Ashiq, Athul, and Sheeja) of charges under IPC sections 381 (theft), 201 (destruction of evidence), and 411 (receiving stolen property) with common intention. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt because key witnesses—including the complainant—did not support the prosecution's allegations that 13 mobile phones worth Rs. 1,50,376 were stolen from Falcon Logistics in October 2019. The accused were acquitted and released from bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2026
Order/ Judgement
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
19-Feb-2026
Appearance Of Parties
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
05-Feb-2026
Appearance Of Parties
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
26-Dec-2025
Issue NBW
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
12-Dec-2025
Appearance of Accused
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
27-Nov-2025
Appearance of Accused
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
18-Nov-2025
For Hearing
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
27-Oct-2025
Await report
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
17-Sep-2025
Issue NBW
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
11-Aug-2025
Issue Summons
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
01-Aug-2025
Call on
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
31-Jul-2025
Repeat Summons
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
21-Jun-2025
Odering Cmp
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
18-Jun-2025
Odering Cmp
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
16-Jun-2025
Odering Cmp
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
11-Jun-2025
Await report
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
05-Jun-2025
No sitting notified
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
26-May-2025
No sitting notified
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
13-May-2025
For framing charge
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
12-May-2025
Await report
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
25-Feb-2025
Appearance of Accused
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
10-Jan-2025
Appearance of Accused
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
28-Nov-2024
Appearance of Accused
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
25-Nov-2024
Appearance of Accused
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
22-Nov-2024
No sitting notified
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
07-Aug-2024
Return of summons
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
20-May-2024
Return of summons
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
06-Apr-2024
Return of summons
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
17-Jan-2024
Return of summons
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
12-Oct-2023
Return of summons
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
19-Jul-2023
Return of summons
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
24-Mar-2023
Return of summons
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
22-Dec-2022
Return of summons
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
26-Nov-2022
Return of summons
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
29-Sep-2022
Return of summons
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
16-Jul-2022
Return of summons
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
05-Mar-2022
Return of summons
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
30-Nov-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Oct-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 101519/2021
The Judicial First-Class Magistrate, Kadakkal acquitted all five accused (Faihas, Muhammed Jubin, Muhammed Ashiq, Athul, and Sheeja) of charges under IPC sections 381 (theft), 201 (destruction of evidence), and 411 (receiving stolen property) with common intention. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt because key witnesses—including the complainant—did not support the prosecution's allegations that 13 mobile phones worth Rs. 1,50,376 were stolen from Falcon Logistics in October 2019. The accused were acquitted and released from bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts