State of Kerala (Police) vs Nisamudeen Advocate - DIPIN S — 101513/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,148,341,294(b), 324,149,323. Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 271 BNSS on 09th June 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKM350022512021
Filing Number
101513/2021
Filing Date
21-Oct-2021
Registration No
101513/2021
Registration Date
21-Oct-2021
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kadakkal
Judge
1-Judl First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
09-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 271 BNSS
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
670
Police Station
Chithara Police Station
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Kerala (Police)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nisamudeen Advocate - DIPIN S
-
2.Muhammed Irfan
-
3.Navas
Adv. DIPIN S
-
4.Shameer
Adv. DIPIN S
-
5.Muhammed Sajid
Adv. DIPIN S
-
6.Afsal
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Jun-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Nisamudeen & Others (1513/2021) The Kadakkal First-Class Magistrate acquitted accused nos. A1, A2, A4-A6 of charges under IPC sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 323, 324 r/w 149, finding them not guilty due to prosecution's failure to prove its case. The eye witness (PW1) stated he did not know the culprits, while other witnesses (PW2, PW3) claimed they did not witness the incident; consequently, the Assistant Public Prosecutor abandoned remaining witnesses, resulting in acquittal under BNSS 2023 section 271(1). The case against A3 was separated and refiled separately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
Disposed
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
04-Jun-2026
Order/Judgement
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
03-Jun-2026
Appearance of Accused
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
29-May-2026
No sitting notified
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
20-Apr-2026
Appearance Of Parties
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
17-Apr-2026
Call on
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
18-Mar-2026
No sitting notified
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
03-Mar-2026
Report on mediation
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
20-Feb-2026
For return of summons
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
19-Feb-2026
For framing charge
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
31-Jan-2026
To summon witness
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
23-Jan-2026
For framing charge
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
20-Dec-2025
Appearance of Accused
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
07-Nov-2025
For framing charge
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
11-Sep-2025
Return of warrant
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
03-Sep-2025
Return of warrant
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
28-May-2025
Issue Bailable Warrant
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
23-Jan-2025
Issue Summons
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
08-Oct-2024
Issue Summons
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
18-Jun-2024
Issue Summons
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
17-Jun-2024
Summons in Ca
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
25-Mar-2024
Summons in Ca
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
10-Jan-2024
Return of summons
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
09-Oct-2023
Return of summons
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
04-Jul-2023
Return of summons
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
18-Mar-2023
Return of summons
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
13-Dec-2022
Return of summons
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
13-Oct-2022
Return of summons
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
05-Aug-2022
Return of summons
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
30-Mar-2022
Return of summons
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
23-Nov-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Oct-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 101513/2021
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Nisamudeen & Others (1513/2021) The Kadakkal First-Class Magistrate acquitted accused nos. A1, A2, A4-A6 of charges under IPC sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 323, 324 r/w 149, finding them not guilty due to prosecution's failure to prove its case. The eye witness (PW1) stated he did not know the culprits, while other witnesses (PW2, PW3) claimed they did not witness the incident; consequently, the Assistant Public Prosecutor abandoned remaining witnesses, resulting in acquittal under BNSS 2023 section 271(1). The case against A3 was separated and refiled separately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts