State of Kerala (Police) vs Sugathan Advocate - VINAYAKUMAR — 100630/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 447,294(b),506(ii). Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 271 BNSS on 07th April 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKM350022372022
Filing Number
100630/2022
Filing Date
31-08-2022
Registration No
100630/2022
Registration Date
19-09-2022
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kadakkal
Judge
1-Judl First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 271 BNSS
FIR Details
FIR Number
969
Police Station
Kadakkal
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Respondent(s)
Sugathan Advocate - VINAYAKUMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judl First Class Magistrate
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Report on mediation
Repeat Summons
Issue Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 31-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 12-03-2026 | Report on mediation |
| 09-02-2026 | Repeat Summons |
| 18-12-2025 | Issue Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Sugathan (Case 630/2022) The Kadakkal Judicial Magistrate acquitted Sugathan of charges under IPC sections 447 (criminal trespass), 506(ii) (criminal intimidation), and 294(b) (obscene words) on April 7, 2026. The prosecution's case collapsed after the two key witnesses—the complainant and the occurrence witness—testified that they did not know the accused and denied the allegations, prompting the Assistant Public Prosecutor to withdraw the case. The court found the prosecution failed to establish guilt and released the accused on liberty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Sugathan (Case 630/2022) The Kadakkal Judicial Magistrate acquitted Sugathan of charges under IPC sections 447 (criminal trespass), 506(ii) (criminal intimidation), and 294(b) (obscene words) on April 7, 2026. The prosecution's case collapsed after the two key witnesses—the complainant and the occurrence witness—testified that they did not know the accused and denied the allegations, prompting the Assistant Public Prosecutor to withdraw the case. The court found the prosecution failed to establish guilt and released the accused on liberty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts