State of Kerala (Police) vs Girilal Advocate - Ajimon V — 100058/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,354,509. Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED on 07th May 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKM350019112019
Filing Number
100058/2019
Filing Date
30-01-2019
Registration No
100058/2019
Registration Date
30-01-2019
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kadakkal
Judge
1-Judl First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
1638
Police Station
Kadakkal
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Girilal Advocate - Ajimon V
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judl First Class Magistrate
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
For further hearing
FOR HEARING
Prays time
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-04-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 20-04-2026 | For further hearing |
| 17-04-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 06-04-2026 | Prays time |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Girilal (2019/2026) The court acquitted Girilal of all charges under IPC Sections 323, 341, 354, and 509, finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Critical deficiencies included material omissions in witness statements (allegations of shawl removal absent from the FIR), a five-day delay in filing the complaint with inadequate explanation, absence of corroborating medical evidence (no visible injuries noted), failure to examine available independent witnesses, and significant prior enmity between parties creating reasonable doubt about credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Girilal (2019/2026) The court acquitted Girilal of all charges under IPC Sections 323, 341, 354, and 509, finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Critical deficiencies included material omissions in witness statements (allegations of shawl removal absent from the FIR), a five-day delay in filing the complaint with inadequate explanation, absence of corroborating medical evidence (no visible injuries noted), failure to examine available independent witnesses, and significant prior enmity between parties creating reasonable doubt about credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts