State of Kerala (Police) vs SAJAN — 100472/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),34,427,323,341. Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 271 BNSS on 04th May 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKM350016332023
e-Filing Number
05-05-2023
Filing Number
1633/2023
Filing Date
19-05-2023
Registration No
100472/2023
Registration Date
19-05-2023
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kadakkal
Judge
1-Judl First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 271 BNSS
FIR Details
FIR Number
391
Police Station
Chithara Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Respondent(s)
SAJAN
VISHNU
VIMAL RAJ
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judl First Class Magistrate
Disposed
Order/Judgement
Appearance Of Parties
Issue NBW
Appearance Of Parties
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-04-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 31-03-2026 | Appearance Of Parties |
| 12-03-2026 | Issue NBW |
| 23-02-2026 | Appearance Of Parties |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Sajan, Vishnu, and Vimal Raj (Calendar Case 472/2023) The court acquitted all three accused of charges under IPC sections 341 and 427 r/w 34 after the prosecution's case collapsed. Key prosecution witnesses (PW1 and PW2) failed to support the allegations—PW1 categorically stated she did not know the culprits, and PW2 denied the entire prosecution case. Consequently, the Assistant Public Prosecutor abandoned remaining witnesses, and the court found insufficient incriminating evidence to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Sajan, Vishnu, and Vimal Raj (Calendar Case 472/2023) The court acquitted all three accused of charges under IPC sections 341 and 427 r/w 34 after the prosecution's case collapsed. Key prosecution witnesses (PW1 and PW2) failed to support the allegations—PW1 categorically stated she did not know the culprits, and PW2 denied the entire prosecution case. Consequently, the Assistant Public Prosecutor abandoned remaining witnesses, and the court found insufficient incriminating evidence to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts