SHO Kadakkal vs Shafeek — 3333/2015
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,294(b),323,325,506(1). Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 271 BNSS on 06th April 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKM350009662015
Filing Number
3335/2015
Filing Date
30-Dec-2015
Registration No
3333/2015
Registration Date
30-Dec-2015
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kadakkal
Judge
1-Judl First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
06-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 271 BNSS
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1637
Police Station
Kadakkal
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHO (Station House Officer) Kadakkal
Adv. APP KADAKKAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shafeek
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Apr-2026
JudgementView PDF
Summary: Shafeek was acquitted of all charges under IPC sections 341, 294(b), 323, 324, and 506(i) in a case involving alleged wrongful restraint, abusive language, and assault of a school classmate on November 4, 2015. The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt because the police could not trace or produce crucial material witnesses (CW1-CW6) despite adopting coercive measures, leaving the prosecution with no substantive evidence to establish the allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
Disposed
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
27-Mar-2026
Order/ Judgement
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
18-Mar-2026
No sitting notified
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
02-Mar-2026
Repeat Summons
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
24-Feb-2026
Repeat Summons
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
27-Jan-2026
Issue Summons
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
08-Jan-2026
Repeat Summons
Judl First Class Magistrate
-
11-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Dec-2015
Case filed
Registration No. 3333/2015
Summary: Shafeek was acquitted of all charges under IPC sections 341, 294(b), 323, 324, and 506(i) in a case involving alleged wrongful restraint, abusive language, and assault of a school classmate on November 4, 2015. The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt because the police could not trace or produce crucial material witnesses (CW1-CW6) despite adopting coercive measures, leaving the prosecution with no substantive evidence to establish the allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts