State of Kerala (Police) vs SAJITH — 415/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281,281. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

Cr.No(KLM-PS-Kadakkal) - Kadakkal Police Station

CNR: KLKM350003792026

e-Filing Number

25-01-2026

Filing Number

100/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

415/2026

Registration Date

14-Feb-2026

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kadakkal

Judge

1-Judl First Class Magistrate

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

100

Police Station

Kadakkal

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281,281
Motor Vehicle Act \ Section 185,185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Kerala (Police)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAJITH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case 415/2026 Summary: Sajith was convicted on his guilty plea for rash or negligent act endangering life (Section 281, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita) and drunk driving (Section 185, Motor Vehicle Act). The court sentenced him to simple imprisonment till rising of court for the Motor Vehicle Act offense and a fine of Rs. 500 for the rash act offense, with 10 days imprisonment as default penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    For return of summons

    Judl First Class Magistrate

  5. 14-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 415/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 415/2026 Summary: Sajith was convicted on his guilty plea for rash or negligent act endangering life (Section 281, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita) and drunk driving (Section 185, Motor Vehicle Act). The court sentenced him to simple imprisonment till rising of court for the Motor Vehicle Act offense and a fine of Rs. 500 for the rash act offense, with 10 days imprisonment as default penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case