State of Kerala (Police) vs PRASAD — 43/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 3(5),303(2),303(2),3(5). Status: No sitting notified. Next hearing: 17th November 2026.
Cr.No(KLM-PS-Paripally) - Paripally Police Station
CNR: KLKM340063822025
Next Hearing
17th November 2026
e-Filing Number
11-12-2025
Filing Number
2035/2025
Filing Date
13-12-2025
Registration No
43/2026
Registration Date
24-01-2026
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Paravur
Judge
1-Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate
FIR Details
FIR Number
2035
Police Station
Parippally PS
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Respondent(s)
PRASAD
SUDHEESH
PRAKASH
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate
No sitting notified
To record plea of the accused
Order/Judgement
Order/Judgement
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | No sitting notified |
| 27-02-2026 | To record plea of the accused |
| 26-02-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 23-02-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 21-02-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Interim Orders
Case 43/2026 Summary: Bail applications filed by Prasad, Sudheesh, and Prakash—accused of theft of machine iron parts worth Rs. 20,000 from AS Quality Crusher on 10.12.2025 under sections 303(2) r/w 3(5) of BNS—were allowed. The court granted bail on self-bonds of Rs. 50,000 each, noting the accused had completed 2½ months judicial custody and the investigation was concluded. Conditions imposed include non-interference with witnesses, no evidence tampering, and no criminal activity during bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 43/2026 Summary: Bail applications filed by Prasad, Sudheesh, and Prakash—accused of theft of machine iron parts worth Rs. 20,000 from AS Quality Crusher on 10.12.2025 under sections 303(2) r/w 3(5) of BNS—were allowed. The court granted bail on self-bonds of Rs. 50,000 each, noting the accused had completed 2½ months judicial custody and the investigation was concluded. Conditions imposed include non-interference with witnesses, no evidence tampering, and no criminal activity during bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts