State of Kerala vs Balu Advocate - B.Suresh — 100859/2016

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,323,324,506(i),149IPC. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLKM340035262016

Filing Number

1112727/2016

Filing Date

07-Jul-2016

Registration No

100859/2016

Registration Date

07-Jul-2016

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Paravur

Judge

1-Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC

Last updated 30-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1040

Police Station

Paravoor PS

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,323,324,506(i),149IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Kerala

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Balu Advocate - B.Suresh

  2. 2.Sujith

  3. 3.Ashiq suresh

  4. 4.Prasanth

    Adv. B.Suresh

  5. 5.Pradmod

    Adv. B.Suresh

  6. 6.Vishnu

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Balu Advocate (859/2016) Decision: The court acquitted all five living accused (Balu, Sujith, Prasanth, Pramod, and Vishnu) of charges under IPC sections 143, 147, 323, 324, 506, and 149 for an alleged June 2016 assault. The prosecution's case failed due to insufficient evidence—key witnesses turned hostile, and only two accused were identified by witnesses with no proof of specific overt acts or common intention required for unlawful assembly charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    No sitting notified

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    No sitting notified

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  9. 06-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  10. 31-Jan-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  11. 14-Jan-2026

    Appearance of Accused

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  12. 07-Jan-2026

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  13. 16-Dec-2025

    82-83 Steps

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  14. 02-Dec-2025

    Repeat Summons

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  15. 15-Nov-2025

    Repeat Summons

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  16. 24-Oct-2025

    Repeat Summons

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  17. 07-Oct-2025

    Repeat Summons

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  18. 26-Aug-2025

    Repeat Summons

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  19. 28-Jul-2025

    Repeat Summons

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  20. 11-Jun-2025

    Issue Summons

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  21. 25-Apr-2025

    Issue Summons

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  22. 27-Feb-2025

    Issue Summons

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  23. 10-Feb-2025

    82-83 Steps

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  24. 28-Jan-2025

    82-83 Steps

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  25. 07-Jan-2025

    Issue bailable warrant to witness

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  26. 17-Dec-2024

    Issue bailable warrant to witness

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  27. 30-Aug-2024

    No sitting notified

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  28. 03-Jul-2024

    No sitting notified

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  29. 30-Apr-2024

    No sitting notified

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  30. 18-Mar-2024

    Issue bailable warrant to witness

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  31. 09-Feb-2024

    Issue bailable warrant to witness

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  32. 04-Jan-2024

    Repeat Summons

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  33. 06-Dec-2023

    Issue bailable warrant to witness

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  34. 27-Oct-2023

    Issue bailable warrant to witness

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  35. 29-Sep-2023

    Repeat Summons

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  36. 04-Jul-2023

    Repeat Summons

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  37. 16-May-2023

    Repeat Summons

  38. 07-Mar-2023

    Repeat Summons

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  39. 14-Dec-2022

    Repeat Summons

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  40. 25-Oct-2022

    Repeat Summons

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  41. 05-Aug-2022

    Repeat Summons

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  42. 20-Jun-2022

    Return of summons

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  43. 25-Apr-2022

    Return of summons

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  44. 07-Apr-2022

    repeat NBW

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  45. 21-Mar-2022

    Issue Summons

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  46. 11-Mar-2022

    repeat NBW

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  47. 07-Jan-2022

    repeat NBW

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  48. 06-Oct-2021

    repeat NBW

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  49. 29-Apr-2021

    repeat NBW

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  50. 20-Mar-2021

    repeat NBW

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  51. 17-Nov-2020

    Appearance of Appellant

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  52. 09-Oct-2020

    Appearance of Appellant

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  53. 07-Oct-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  54. 07-Jul-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100859/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Balu Advocate (859/2016) Decision: The court acquitted all five living accused (Balu, Sujith, Prasanth, Pramod, and Vishnu) of charges under IPC sections 143, 147, 323, 324, 506, and 149 for an alleged June 2016 assault. The prosecution's case failed due to insufficient evidence—key witnesses turned hostile, and only two accused were identified by witnesses with no proof of specific overt acts or common intention required for unlawful assembly charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case