State of Kerala vs Jaffar — 103008/2015
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 447,294(b),323,324,34. Status: No sitting notified. Next hearing: 26th June 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKM340027912015
Next Hearing
26th June 2026
Filing Number
103008/2015
Filing Date
16-11-2015
Registration No
103008/2015
Registration Date
16-11-2015
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Paravur
Judge
1-Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate
FIR Details
FIR Number
420
Police Station
Chathannoor PS
Year
2011
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Jaffar
Naushad
Asharaf
Fatimabeevi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate
No sitting notified
Issue Summons
Call on
Order/Judgement
Order/Judgement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | No sitting notified |
| 18-03-2026 | Issue Summons |
| 16-03-2026 | Call on |
| 12-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 26-02-2026 | Order/Judgement |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC 3008/2015 Outcome: The Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (CMP) filed by the Assistant Public Prosecutor was allowed. The court permitted the prosecution to produce the original statements of three witnesses (CW4, CW5, and CW6) that had been missing from the final investigation report but subsequently located in police station files. The court rejected the defence's allegation of fabrication, finding no prejudice to the accused since they would have opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses after receiving copies of the statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC 3008/2015 Outcome: The Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (CMP) filed by the Assistant Public Prosecutor was allowed. The court permitted the prosecution to produce the original statements of three witnesses (CW4, CW5, and CW6) that had been missing from the final investigation report but subsequently located in police station files. The court rejected the defence's allegation of fabrication, finding no prejudice to the accused since they would have opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses after receiving copies of the statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts