State Of Kerala (Parply) vs SHAN — 100597/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498(A). Status: Repeat Summons. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLKM340013902022

Repeat Summons

Next Hearing

21st July 2026

Filing Number

101395/2022

Filing Date

19-07-2022

Registration No

100597/2022

Registration Date

19-07-2022

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Paravur

Judge

1-Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

FIR Details

FIR Number

435

Police Station

Parippally PS

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

IPC Section 498(A)

Petitioner(s)

State Of Kerala (Parply)

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

SHAN

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

21-04-2026

Repeat Summons

10-04-2026

Order/Judgement

08-04-2026

Order/Judgement

07-04-2026

Order/Judgement

04-04-2026

Order/Judgement

Interim Orders

21-04-2026
Judgement

Summary of Case 100597/2022 The court dismissed a petition seeking further investigation in a dowry cruelty case (IPC §498A). Shensi, the complainant-wife, sought additional investigation into alleged misappropriation of property, vehicle transfers, and inadequate witness documentation three years after charges were framed against her husband (a police officer) on 05.08.2022. The court rejected the plea, finding insufficient prima facie evidence against the accused's parents, noting the complainant's delay in raising omissions and that the trial had already commenced with charge framing, placing the petition beyond the magistrate's permissible jurisdiction for ordering further investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 100597/2022 The court dismissed a petition seeking further investigation in a dowry cruelty case (IPC §498A). Shensi, the complainant-wife, sought additional investigation into alleged misappropriation of property, vehicle transfers, and inadequate witness documentation three years after charges were framed against her husband (a police officer) on 05.08.2022. The court rejected the plea, finding insufficient prima facie evidence against the accused's parents, noting the complainant's delay in raising omissions and that the trial had already commenced with charge framing, placing the petition beyond the magistrate's permissible jurisdiction for ordering further investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Paravur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case