State of Kerala police vs Ashokan — 100536/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,148,323,324,r/w 149. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC on 31st March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKM340000172019
Filing Number
100536/2019
Filing Date
29-05-2020
Registration No
100536/2019
Registration Date
29-05-2020
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Paravur
Judge
1-Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate
Decision Date
31st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
370
Police Station
Chathannoor PS
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala police
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Ashokan
Suriyan
Athul
Shibin
Manu
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate
Disposed
No sitting notified
FOR HEARING
Issue notice
82-83 Steps
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-03-2026 | No sitting notified |
| 12-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 19-02-2026 | Issue notice |
| 29-01-2026 | 82-83 Steps |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Kerala Police v. Ashokan, Suryan, Athul & Others (Case 536/2019) All five accused were acquitted of charges under IPC sections 143, 147, 148, 323, 324, and 149 (unlawful assembly, rioting, and causing hurt). The court found insufficient evidence after the victim (sole prosecution witness) turned hostile, denying that accused nos. 1, 2, and 5 harmed him and stating accused nos. 3 and 4 were not involved. With no corroborating witnesses and the victim testifying the matter was settled, conviction could not be sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Kerala Police v. Ashokan, Suryan, Athul & Others (Case 536/2019) All five accused were acquitted of charges under IPC sections 143, 147, 148, 323, 324, and 149 (unlawful assembly, rioting, and causing hurt). The court found insufficient evidence after the victim (sole prosecution witness) turned hostile, denying that accused nos. 1, 2, and 5 harmed him and stating accused nos. 3 and 4 were not involved. With no corroborating witnesses and the victim testifying the matter was settled, conviction could not be sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts