Soubhagya Finance vs Emmanuel — 1741/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 210,223. Status: For Steps. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.

For Steps Next hearing 03-Jul-2026 this date has passed

Crl.MP - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETN.

CNR: KLKM310042662025

Filing Number

1865/2025

Filing Date

03-Sep-2025

Registration No

1741/2025

Registration Date

26-Sep-2025

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Chavara

Judge

1-Judl. First Class Magistrate

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 210,223

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Soubhagya Finance

    Adv. NISA FASIL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Emmanuel

Case History

  1. 03-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    For Steps

    Judl. First Class Magistrate

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Call on

    Judl. First Class Magistrate

  4. 24-Dec-2025

    No sitting notified

    Judl. First Class Magistrate

  5. 30-Oct-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 1741/2025 (Soubhagya Finance v. Emmanuel) The court found the matter to be civil in nature and determined that no further police investigation was required. The case was adjourned and posted for recording the sworn statement of the petitioner under Section 223 of the BNSS, as the SHO's report indicated proper investigative procedures had not been followed and no recovery was needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 30-Oct-2025

    Appearance of Petitioner

    Judl. First Class Magistrate

  7. 27-Oct-2025

    Orders in IA

    Judl. First Class Magistrate

  8. 24-Oct-2025

    For hearing in Cmp

    Judl. First Class Magistrate

  9. 18-Oct-2025

    For hearing in Cmp

    Judl. First Class Magistrate

  10. 08-Oct-2025

    For appearence of Complainant

    Judl. First Class Magistrate

  11. 26-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 03-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1741/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 1741/2025 (Soubhagya Finance v. Emmanuel) The court found the matter to be civil in nature and determined that no further police investigation was required. The case was adjourned and posted for recording the sworn statement of the petitioner under Section 223 of the BNSS, as the SHO's report indicated proper investigative procedures had not been followed and no recovery was needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case