Raju vs Kochukunju Muhammedkunju Advocate - ABHAYA KUMAR G — 100350/2020

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 26. Status: Call on. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLKM280005572020

Call on

Next Hearing

16th June 2026

Filing Number

541/2020

Filing Date

27-10-2020

Registration No

100350/2020

Registration Date

28-10-2020

Court

Munsiff Court ,Karunagappally

Judge

1-Munsiff

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 26
IA/1/2026 Classification : Application Seeking Extension Of Time Section RajuSajimon

Petitioner(s)

Raju

Adv. MANOJ. R

Suja John

Adv. MANOJ. R

Denoy Sajimon

Adv. MANOJ. R

Respondent(s)

Kochukunju Muhammedkunju Advocate - ABHAYA KUMAR G

Sunu

Adv. ABHAYA KUMAR G

Ponnamma Sunu

Adv. ABHAYA KUMAR G

Kunjumon

Sajimon

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff

07-04-2026

Call on

13-03-2026

Stayed by High Court

05-02-2026

No sitting notified

12-01-2026

No Further Time

05-01-2026

Call on

Interim Orders

17-12-2020
Order
11-12-2025
Order

Case Summary: OS 350/2020 - IA 6/2024 Court: Munsiff Court, Karunagappally Date: 11 December 2025 Outcome: Petition allowed. The court granted the 1st defendant (Raju) permission to amend his written statement and incorporate a counter-claim seeking declaration of his ¼ share in the disputed property and a permanent prohibitory injunction against the plaintiffs. The court found that disallowing the amendment would cause irreparable injury and lead to multiplicity of litigation, as the 2nd defendant had allegedly transferred his ¼ share to the 1st defendant. Amendments must be filed within five days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS 350/2020 - IA 6/2024 Court: Munsiff Court, Karunagappally Date: 11 December 2025 Outcome: Petition allowed. The court granted the 1st defendant (Raju) permission to amend his written statement and incorporate a counter-claim seeking declaration of his ¼ share in the disputed property and a permanent prohibitory injunction against the plaintiffs. The court found that disallowing the amendment would cause irreparable injury and lead to multiplicity of litigation, as the 2nd defendant had allegedly transferred his ¼ share to the 1st defendant. Amendments must be filed within five days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Court ,Karunagappally All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case