C.V.Balamohan vs Pramod @ Kuttan Advocate - VIPIN. K — 100169/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: No sitting notified. Next hearing: 05th August 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKM280002032023
Filing Number
202/2023
Filing Date
28-Mar-2023
Registration No
100169/2023
Registration Date
30-Mar-2023
Court
Munsiff Court ,Karunagappally
Judge
1-Munsiff
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.C.V.Balamohan
Adv. Sethukrishnan S, Sethukrishnan S
-
2.Santha.N
Adv. SETHU KRISHNAN S
-
3.Sachin.R
Adv. SETHU KRISHNAN S
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pramod @ Kuttan Advocate - VIPIN. K
-
2.Green Channel Resort
-
3.Government department
Adv. SUNIL.P.S
-
4.Government department
Adv. SUNIL.P.S
Case History
-
05-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
02-Jun-2026
No sitting notified
Munsiff
-
18-Mar-2026
Report on mediation
Munsiff
-
17-Jan-2026
For reports
Munsiff
-
15-Nov-2025
Appearance Of Parties
Munsiff
-
23-Oct-2025
Verify and report
Munsiff
-
17-Sep-2025
For Steps
Munsiff
-
28-Jul-2025
Objection
Munsiff
-
03-Jun-2025
Verify and report
Munsiff
-
18-Jan-2025
Objection
Munsiff
-
29-Nov-2024
Bcf and steps
Munsiff
-
07-Nov-2024
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
15-Oct-2024
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
05-Aug-2024
Call on
Munsiff
-
25-Jun-2024
Call on
Munsiff
-
29-May-2024
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
25-Jan-2024
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 100169/2023 Outcome: Interim injunction petition partially granted. The court ordered the 1st defendant (Pramod @ Kuttan) to maintain status quo on all further construction work in the pathway (Plaint B Schedule) until the suit's adjudication. Key Facts: Plaintiffs sought to restrain defendants from narrowing a public pathway and constructing without proper authorization. The 1st defendant had begun unauthorized construction work (4.5 meters wide) in the pathway since March 2023. The court found the plaintiffs have a credible claim to easement rights through 20+ years of uninterrupted use and noted the Municipality report showed the construction violates rules. However, since construction had already commenced, the court imposed status quo rather than complete restraint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Jan-2024
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
18-Jan-2024
For further hearing
Munsiff
-
11-Jan-2024
Call on
Munsiff
-
09-Oct-2023
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
03-Oct-2023
For Objection and hearing
Munsiff
-
10-Jul-2023
Call on
Munsiff
-
05-Jul-2023
For Objection and hearing
Munsiff
-
04-Jul-2023
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
30-Mar-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Mar-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 100169/2023
Case Summary: 100169/2023 Outcome: Interim injunction petition partially granted. The court ordered the 1st defendant (Pramod @ Kuttan) to maintain status quo on all further construction work in the pathway (Plaint B Schedule) until the suit's adjudication. Key Facts: Plaintiffs sought to restrain defendants from narrowing a public pathway and constructing without proper authorization. The 1st defendant had begun unauthorized construction work (4.5 meters wide) in the pathway since March 2023. The court found the plaintiffs have a credible claim to easement rights through 20+ years of uninterrupted use and noted the Municipality report showed the construction violates rules. However, since construction had already commenced, the court imposed status quo rather than complete restraint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts