Amruthendra Gupthan and another vs Prathap Advocate - Bushara — 100111/2016

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section section26order7Rule1. Status: No sitting notified. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLKM280001402016

No sitting notified

Next Hearing

20th July 2026

Filing Number

100958/2016

Filing Date

26-02-2016

Registration No

100111/2016

Registration Date

26-02-2016

Court

Munsiff Court ,Karunagappally

Judge

1-Munsiff

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code Section section26order7Rule1
IA/6/2024 Classification : Direction Petition Section Amruthendra Gupthan and anotherPrathap
IA/7/2025 Classification : Direction Petition Section Amruthendra Gupthan and anotherPrathap
IA/1/2026 Classification : Petition Section Prathap

Petitioner(s)

Amruthendra Gupthan and another

Adv. G. Gopakumar

Sreeja

Respondent(s)

Prathap Advocate - Bushara

Nirmala Hentry

Adv. D.BAIJUKUAMR,JAYACHANDRA TILAK B

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff

03-06-2026

No sitting notified

07-04-2026

For commission report

13-03-2026

For commission report

24-02-2026

For commission report

30-01-2026

No sitting notified

Interim Orders

26-07-2021
Order
02-11-2021
Order

Case Summary: O.S No. 111/2016 (I.A No. 03/21) The Munsiff Court at Karunagappally allowed the plaintiffs' application to amend the plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC on November 2, 2021. The suit concerns the nullification of sale deed 42/2010 and recovery of property. The court permitted amendment to incorporate the relief of reconveyance and related particulars, finding the amendment essential for resolving the core controversy and causing no prejudice to defendants since trial had not commenced. The amended plaint must be executed within one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S No. 111/2016 (I.A No. 03/21) The Munsiff Court at Karunagappally allowed the plaintiffs' application to amend the plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC on November 2, 2021. The suit concerns the nullification of sale deed 42/2010 and recovery of property. The court permitted amendment to incorporate the relief of reconveyance and related particulars, finding the amendment essential for resolving the core controversy and causing no prejudice to defendants since trial had not commenced. The amended plaint must be executed within one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Court ,Karunagappally All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case