Raju @ Pita Jyothirmayananda Swamikal vs Prasannakumari Advocate - G.Harikumar Nedumangad — 100074/2022
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 142. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 255 BNSS on 21st April 2026.
ST - SUMMARY TRIAL
CNR: KLKM280001192022
Filing Number
74/2022
Filing Date
10-Jan-2022
Registration No
100074/2022
Registration Date
10-Jan-2022
Court
Munsiff Court ,Karunagappally
Judge
1-Munsiff
Decision Date
21-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 255 BNSS
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Raju @ Pita Jyothirmayananda Swamikal
Adv. Sajjukiran. K
Respondent(s)
-
1.Prasannakumari Advocate - G.Harikumar Nedumangad
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Apr-2026
Judgement
The court acquitted Smt. Prasannakumari of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding that the complainant failed to comply with mandatory statutory requirements (failure to produce original legal notice documents) and failed to establish a legally enforceable debt through credible evidence. Key weaknesses included the complainant's inability to document the source of Rs. 9 lakhs allegedly loaned, vague transaction details, and failure to examine corroborating witnesses, which allowed the accused to successfully rebut presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the NI Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
Disposed
Munsiff
-
16-Apr-2026
Order/ Judgement
Munsiff
-
27-Mar-2026
For further hearing
Munsiff
-
18-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
28-Feb-2026
No sitting notified
Munsiff
-
16-Feb-2026
No sitting notified
Munsiff
-
09-Feb-2026
Adjourned
Munsiff
-
24-Jan-2026
No sitting notified
Munsiff
-
09-Jan-2026
No sitting notified
Munsiff
-
30-Dec-2025
No sitting notified
Munsiff
-
26-Dec-2025
Order/ Judgement
Munsiff
-
23-Dec-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
06-Dec-2025
No sitting notified
Munsiff
-
22-Nov-2025
Defence Evidence
Munsiff
-
25-Oct-2025
Defence Evidence
Munsiff
-
04-Oct-2025
Call on
Munsiff
-
08-Sep-2025
For Steps
Munsiff
-
16-Aug-2025
For return of summons
Munsiff
-
19-Jul-2025
Issue Summons
Munsiff
-
05-Jul-2025
Further evidence
Munsiff
-
21-Jun-2025
for evidence.
Munsiff
-
22-May-2025
Call on
Munsiff
-
02-May-2025
Call on
Munsiff
-
22-Apr-2025
Call on
Munsiff
-
22-Feb-2025
for evidence.
Munsiff
-
27-Jan-2025
for evidence.
Munsiff
-
14-Jan-2025
No sitting notified
Munsiff
-
27-Dec-2024
No sitting notified
Munsiff
-
29-Nov-2024
for evidence.
Munsiff
-
26-Oct-2024
For settlement
Munsiff
-
11-Oct-2024
For cross examination.
Munsiff
-
03-Oct-2024
For cross examination.
Munsiff
-
12-Sep-2024
For cross examination.
Munsiff
-
12-Aug-2024
Issue Arrest Warrant
Munsiff
-
30-Jul-2024
Call on
Munsiff
-
10-Jul-2024
for evidence.
Munsiff
-
06-Jun-2024
Call on
Munsiff
-
29-May-2024
for evidence.
Munsiff
-
10-May-2024
for evidence.
Munsiff
-
06-Apr-2024
Call on
Munsiff
-
22-Feb-2024
for evidence.
Munsiff
-
18-Jan-2024
for evidence.
Munsiff
-
27-Nov-2023
Call on
Munsiff
-
30-Oct-2023
for evidence.
Munsiff
-
04-Oct-2023
for evidence.
Munsiff
-
24-Aug-2023
Call on
Munsiff
-
29-May-2023
No sitting notified
Munsiff
-
20-Mar-2023
No sitting notified
Munsiff
-
16-Feb-2023
No sitting notified
Munsiff
-
21-Dec-2022
No sitting notified
Munsiff
-
02-Nov-2022
No sitting notified
Munsiff
-
19-Sep-2022
No sitting notified
Munsiff
-
26-Jul-2022
No sitting notified
Munsiff
-
10-Jun-2022
No sitting notified
Munsiff
-
27-Apr-2022
For Steps
Munsiff
-
15-Mar-2022
Call on
Munsiff
-
10-Jan-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Jan-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 100074/2022
The court acquitted Smt. Prasannakumari of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding that the complainant failed to comply with mandatory statutory requirements (failure to produce original legal notice documents) and failed to establish a legally enforceable debt through credible evidence. Key weaknesses included the complainant's inability to document the source of Rs. 9 lakhs allegedly loaned, vague transaction details, and failure to examine corroborating witnesses, which allowed the accused to successfully rebut presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the NI Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts